富山市
- Hospitals with 400 or more reported beds
- 9.3%
- Share of reported beds at the three largest facilities
- 27.67%
Shares use facilities and bed counts reported in this snapshot; they do not rate places.
Side-by-side comparison
Compare municipality data
Select up to three municipalities and review published measures side by side. Values retain their source periods and geographic basis; the comparison does not rank places or rate healthcare.
Comparison order
Selected municipalities
The list and columns use a stable municipality-code order. Add or replace a place, remove one or clear the selection; the selected codes stay in this page URL.
- 1富山市Toyama Prefecture · 16201
- 2瑞浪市Gifu Prefecture · 21208
- 3海津市Gifu Prefecture · 21221
Published measures
| Measure | 富山市 Toyama Prefecture · 16201 Listed facilities | 瑞浪市 Gifu Prefecture · 21208 Listed facilities | 海津市 Gifu Prefecture · 21221 Listed facilities |
|---|---|---|---|
| Listed hospitals (facilities at provider locations) | 43 | 2 | 2 |
| Reported beds (beds reported by hospitals) | 6,584 | 356 | 275 |
| Resident population (people) | 403,757 | 35,279 | 31,505 |
| Listed hospitals per 100,000 residents | 10.65 | 5.67 | 6.35 |
| Reported beds per 100,000 residents | 1,630.68 | 1,009.1 | 872.88 |
“Reported beds” are not licensed, staffed, available or occupied beds. Per-population rates combine provider-location counts with resident-population denominators; they do not measure access or capacity.
Facility profile and published bed measures
| Measure | 富山市 | 瑞浪市 | 海津市 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Listed hospitals (provider-location count) | 43 | 2 | 2 |
| Facilities with a reported bed count | 43 | 2 | 2 |
| Reported beds (hospital survey field) | 6,584 beds | 356 beds | 275 beds |
| Mean reported beds per reporting facility | 153.12 beds | 178 beds | 137.5 beds |
| Median reported beds per reporting facility | 99 beds | 178 beds | 137.5 beds |
| First quartile (Q1) of reported beds | 54 beds | 113 beds | 118.25 beds |
| Third quartile (Q3) of reported beds | 173.5 beds | 243 beds | 156.75 beds |
Bed summaries exclude records with unknown bed counts. A missing bed count is not treated as zero. These figures describe the listed facility records and do not measure capacity or access.
Distribution of listed hospitals by reported-bed band
Bands are descriptive groups of reported bed counts. They are not quality ratings or rankings.
| Measure | 富山市 | 瑞浪市 | 海津市 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–99 beds | 22 | 1 | 1 |
| 100–199 beds | 12 | 0 | 1 |
| 200–399 beds | 5 | 1 | 0 |
| 400+ beds | 4 | 0 | 0 |
Housing measures
Housing statistics describe the survey's municipal geography and reference period. They are not healthcare measures.
| Measure | 富山市 | 瑞浪市 | 海津市 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Housing units | 203,330 housing units | 16,740 housing units | 12,650 housing units |
| Vacant housing rate | 14.601879% | 17.562724% | 10.039526% |
| Owner-occupied housing rate | 68.470658% | 78.990964% | 92.816635% |
| Rented housing rate | 31.529342% | 21.009036% | 7.183365% |
| Floor area per dwelling | 119.13 m² | 127.2 m² | 152.15 m² |
| Monthly rent (includes zero-yen responses) | 46,861 JPY per month | 45,884 JPY per month | 38,946 JPY per month |
Road traffic safety records
These events are grouped by occurrence-location municipality, not by residents' place of residence or provider location. Counts do not measure individual risk or predict future events.
| Measure | 富山市 | 瑞浪市 | 海津市 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Road traffic accidents | 867 cases | 47 cases | 28 cases |
| Road traffic deaths | 7 people | 2 people | 0 people — Confirmed zero |
| Road traffic injuries | 1,012 people | 56 people | 38 people |
Older population, households and care providers
Resident population
Resident-population geography.
| Measure | 富山市 | 瑞浪市 | 海津市 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Population aged 65 and over | 122,767 people | 11,639 people | 11,257 people |
| Population aged 75 and over | 63,995 people | 6,248 people | 5,330 people |
| Share of population aged 65 and over | 30.1848% | 31.51553% | 34.4472% |
Resident household measures
Household geography, based on residents' place of residence.
| Measure | 富山市 | 瑞浪市 | 海津市 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Single-person households with a householder aged 65 and over | 19,338 households | 1,694 households | 1,139 households |
Care providers by provider location
Provider-location geography. Provider counts do not show where residents receive services or whether services are available.
| Measure | 富山市 | 瑞浪市 | 海津市 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Home-visit care providers | 148 service providers | 11 service providers | 7 service providers |
| Visiting nursing providers | 63 service providers | 7 service providers | 4 service providers |
| Day-care providers | 115 service providers | 11 service providers | 10 service providers |
| Care-management providers | 150 service providers | 10 service providers | 9 service providers |
| Welfare-facility providers | 26 service providers | 3 service providers | 2 service providers |
Projected population
Future values are source-produced projections, not observed future outcomes. Each row retains its stated reference year and observation status.
| Measure | 富山市 | 瑞浪市 | 海津市 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total population — 2020 (baseline) | 413,938 people | 37,150 people | 32,735 people |
| Population aged 65 and over — 2020 (baseline) | 124,012 people | 11,661 people | 11,262 people |
| Population aged 75 and over — 2020 (baseline) | 64,597 people | 6,257 people | 5,331 people |
| Total population — 2025 (projected) | 398,075 people | 35,259 people | 30,362 people |
| Population aged 65 and over — 2025 (projected) | 123,706 people | 11,634 people | 11,546 people |
| Population aged 75 and over — 2025 (projected) | 75,400 people | 6,957 people | 6,434 people |
| Total population — 2030 (projected) | 387,415 people | 33,355 people | 27,845 people |
| Population aged 65 and over — 2030 (projected) | 123,650 people | 11,635 people | 11,402 people |
| Population aged 75 and over — 2030 (projected) | 77,818 people | 7,199 people | 7,082 people |
| Total population — 2035 (projected) | 375,859 people | 31,293 people | 25,261 people |
| Population aged 65 and over — 2035 (projected) | 125,315 people | 11,612 people | 11,060 people |
| Population aged 75 and over — 2035 (projected) | 75,611 people | 7,101 people | 7,055 people |
| Total population — 2040 (projected) | 363,524 people | 29,193 people | 22,670 people |
| Population aged 65 and over — 2040 (projected) | 131,523 people | 11,647 people | 10,816 people |
| Population aged 75 and over — 2040 (projected) | 73,790 people | 7,002 people | 6,714 people |
| Total population — 2045 (projected) | 350,742 people | 27,104 people | 20,148 people |
| Population aged 65 and over — 2045 (projected) | 131,943 people | 11,392 people | 10,166 people |
| Population aged 75 and over — 2045 (projected) | 74,830 people | 6,971 people | 6,335 people |
| Total population — 2050 (projected) | 338,229 people | 25,047 people | 17,756 people |
| Population aged 65 and over — 2050 (projected) | 129,230 people | 10,957 people | 9,313 people |
| Population aged 75 and over — 2050 (projected) | 81,799 people | 7,093 people | 6,206 people |
Children, families and related measures
This group brings together measures with different definitions and source periods. A listed specialty or facility record is not evidence of service quality, capacity, availability or access.
This measure reports the source-published capacity as of 1 April 2025. It does not show vacancies or places currently available. Figures published only for a designated city are not allocated to its wards. Where no ward-level figure is verified, no figure is shown; this does not mean zero.
| Measure | 富山市 | 瑞浪市 | 海津市 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Population aged 0–14 | 85,009 people | 4,187 people | 3,270 people |
| Share of population aged 0–14 | 11.83474% | 11.33736% | 10.00643% |
| Facilities with a listed pediatrics entry | 9 facilities | 0 facilities — Confirmed zero | 0 facilities — Confirmed zero |
| Physicians whose principal specialty is pediatrics | 95 people | 2 people | Not observed |
| Facilities with a listed obstetrics and gynecology entry | 4 facilities | 0 facilities — Confirmed zero | 0 facilities — Confirmed zero |
| Published childcare enrollment capacity | 12,526 capacity slots | 922 capacity slots | 530 capacity slots |
| Households with members under 18 | 35,522 households | 2,957 households | 2,384 households |
| Measure | 富山市 | 瑞浪市 | 海津市 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 2020 | 48,478 people | 4,187 people | 3,272 people |
| Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 2025 | 42,976 people | 3,690 people | 2,530 people |
| Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 2030 | 38,906 people | 3,183 people | 1,996 people |
| Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 2035 | 36,208 people | 2,813 people | 1,654 people |
| Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 2040 | 35,804 people | 2,568 people | 1,445 people |
| Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 2045 | 34,826 people | 2,311 people | 1,240 people |
| Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 2050 | 32,942 people | 2,044 people | 1,023 people |
Diagnosis Procedure Combination (DPC) records
DPC is the Diagnosis Procedure Combination diagnosis-group classification used in these records. DPC/PDPS refers to the separate Diagnosis Procedure Combination / Per-Diem Payment System. The categories and patient counts here describe source records and reporting coverage; they are not a quality rating, hospital recommendation or complete measure of care provided.
| Measure | 富山市 | 瑞浪市 | 海津市 |
|---|---|---|---|
| DPC records | 32 | 1 | 1 |
| Reported DPC patient count | 53,151 people | 3,274 people | Value not returned |
| Reported emergency admissions | 16,007 admissions | 1,536 admissions | Value not returned |
| Reported ambulance transports | 54,077 transports | 3,402 transports | Value not returned |
| Measure | 富山市 | 瑞浪市 | 海津市 |
|---|---|---|---|
| DPC major diagnosis category 06 | 11,238 reported cases (21.14%) | 835 reported cases (25.5%) | Not reported |
| DPC major diagnosis category 04 | 6,073 reported cases (11.43%) | 519 reported cases (15.85%) | Not reported |
| DPC major diagnosis category 05 | 5,530 reported cases (10.4%) | 138 reported cases (4.22%) | Not reported |
| DPC major diagnosis category 11 | 4,487 reported cases (8.44%) | 546 reported cases (16.68%) | Not reported |
| DPC major diagnosis category 02 | 4,250 reported cases (8%) | 164 reported cases (5.01%) | Not reported |
| DPC major diagnosis category 16 | 3,705 reported cases (6.97%) | 525 reported cases (16.04%) | Not reported |
| DPC major diagnosis category 01 | 3,079 reported cases (5.79%) | 65 reported cases (1.99%) | Not reported |
| DPC major diagnosis category 07 | 2,944 reported cases (5.54%) | 170 reported cases (5.19%) | Not reported |
| DPC major diagnosis category 03 | 2,217 reported cases (4.17%) | 42 reported cases (1.28%) | Not reported |
| DPC major diagnosis category 12 | 2,174 reported cases (4.09%) | 31 reported cases (0.95%) | Not reported |
| DPC major diagnosis category 13 | 1,891 reported cases (3.56%) | 27 reported cases (0.82%) | Not reported |
| DPC major diagnosis category 10 | 1,574 reported cases (2.96%) | 113 reported cases (3.45%) | Not reported |
| DPC major diagnosis category 14 | 947 reported cases (1.78%) | Not reported | Not reported |
| DPC major diagnosis category 18 | 943 reported cases (1.77%) | 37 reported cases (1.13%) | Not reported |
| DPC major diagnosis category 08 | 938 reported cases (1.76%) | 51 reported cases (1.56%) | Not reported |
| DPC major diagnosis category 09 | 831 reported cases (1.56%) | 11 reported cases (0.34%) | Not reported |
| DPC major diagnosis category 15 | 221 reported cases (0.42%) | Not reported | Not reported |
| DPC major diagnosis category 17 | 109 reported cases (0.21%) | Not reported | Not reported |
Browse another municipality. Each municipality profile provides its own source details; comparison does not create a combined score or rank.
- Values are descriptive statistics based on the same published facility snapshot.
- Facilities with unknown bed counts are excluded from bed mean, median and distribution summaries; missing bed counts are not treated as zero.
- Numeric differences describe facility composition. They do not indicate healthcare quality, capacity, access, need, adequacy, superiority or rank.
- Population-denominated measures use the Basic Resident Register reference date as descriptive context; they do not measure need, access, quality, adequacy or superiority.
- When a municipality has a zero population denominator, rates per 100,000 residents are not displayed, to avoid division by zero.
Sources and reference periods
Hospital facility data
- Source agency or portal
- Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW)
- Reference period
- 1 June 2026
- Retrieved
- 22 August 2026 at 03:30:08 UTC
Municipality directory
- Source agency or portal
- Government Statistics Portal (e-Stat) / Statistics Bureau of Japan
- Reference period
- 1 June 2026
- Retrieved
- 24 August 2026 at 02:13:46 UTC
Resident population
- Source agency or portal
- Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications / Government Statistics Portal (e-Stat)
- Reference period
- 2025
- Retrieved
- 24 August 2026 at 04:43:28 UTC
Diagnosis Procedure Combination (DPC) records
- Source agency or portal
- Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW)
- Reference period
- 2024-06-01/2025-05-31
- Retrieved
- 24 August 2026 at 18:37:32 UTC
Secondary medical area mapping
- Source agency or portal
- Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare / Government Statistics Portal (e-Stat)
- Reference period
- 1 October 2024
- Retrieved
- 24 August 2026 at 21:55:08 UTC
Source titles and official records may be in Japanese. Dates and geographic units are shown separately for each source.
A missing numeric value is not converted to zero. Open a municipality profile to see its source details and geographic context.