Side-by-side comparison

Compare municipality data

Select up to three municipalities and review published measures side by side. Values retain their source periods and geographic basis; the comparison does not rank places or rate healthcare.

Japanese place names are retained when no verified English name is available.

Comparison order

Selected municipalities

3 / 3 selected

The list and columns use a stable municipality-code order. Add or replace a place, remove one or clear the selection; the selected codes stay in this page URL.

  1. 1
    富山市Toyama Prefecture · 16201
  2. 2
    瑞浪市Gifu Prefecture · 21208
  3. 3
    恵那市Gifu Prefecture · 21210

Published measures

Descriptive values from their stated sources; periods may differ between measures.
Measure富山市
Toyama Prefecture · 16201
Listed facilities
瑞浪市
Gifu Prefecture · 21208
Listed facilities
恵那市
Gifu Prefecture · 21210
Listed facilities
Listed hospitals (facilities at provider locations)4322
Reported beds (beds reported by hospitals)6,584356255
Resident population (people)403,75735,27946,054
Listed hospitals per 100,000 residents10.655.674.34
Reported beds per 100,000 residents1,630.681,009.1553.7

“Reported beds” are not licensed, staffed, available or occupied beds. Per-population rates combine provider-location counts with resident-population denominators; they do not measure access or capacity.

Facility profile and published bed measures

Measure富山市瑞浪市恵那市
Listed hospitals (provider-location count)4322
Facilities with a reported bed count4322
Reported beds (hospital survey field)6,584 beds356 beds255 beds
Mean reported beds per reporting facility153.12 beds178 beds127.5 beds
Median reported beds per reporting facility99 beds178 beds127.5 beds
First quartile (Q1) of reported beds54 beds113 beds91.75 beds
Third quartile (Q3) of reported beds173.5 beds243 beds163.25 beds

Bed summaries exclude records with unknown bed counts. A missing bed count is not treated as zero. These figures describe the listed facility records and do not measure capacity or access.

Distribution of listed hospitals by reported-bed band

Bands are descriptive groups of reported bed counts. They are not quality ratings or rankings.

Measure富山市瑞浪市恵那市
0–99 beds2211
100–199 beds1201
200–399 beds510
400+ beds400

富山市

Hospitals with 400 or more reported beds
9.3%
Share of reported beds at the three largest facilities
27.67%

Shares use facilities and bed counts reported in this snapshot; they do not rate places.

瑞浪市

Hospitals with 400 or more reported beds
0%
Share of reported beds at the three largest facilities
Value not returned

Shares use facilities and bed counts reported in this snapshot; they do not rate places.

恵那市

Hospitals with 400 or more reported beds
0%
Share of reported beds at the three largest facilities
Value not returned

Shares use facilities and bed counts reported in this snapshot; they do not rate places.

Housing measures

Housing statistics describe the survey's municipal geography and reference period. They are not healthcare measures.

Measure富山市瑞浪市恵那市
Housing units203,330 housing units16,740 housing units21,660 housing units
Vacant housing rate14.601879%17.562724%18.651893%
Owner-occupied housing rate68.470658%78.990964%84.782609%
Rented housing rate31.529342%21.009036%15.217391%
Floor area per dwelling119.13 m²127.2 m²138.62 m²
Monthly rent (includes zero-yen responses)46,861 JPY per month45,884 JPY per month36,054 JPY per month

Road traffic safety records

These events are grouped by occurrence-location municipality, not by residents' place of residence or provider location. Counts do not measure individual risk or predict future events.

Measure富山市瑞浪市恵那市
Road traffic accidents867 cases47 cases61 cases
Road traffic deaths7 people2 people3 people
Road traffic injuries1,012 people56 people71 people

Older population, households and care providers

Resident population

Resident-population geography.

Measure富山市瑞浪市恵那市
Population aged 65 and over122,767 people11,639 people16,856 people
Population aged 75 and over63,995 people6,248 people9,076 people
Share of population aged 65 and over30.1848%31.51553%35.5065%

Resident household measures

Household geography, based on residents' place of residence.

Measure富山市瑞浪市恵那市
Single-person households with a householder aged 65 and over19,338 households1,694 households2,365 households

Care providers by provider location

Provider-location geography. Provider counts do not show where residents receive services or whether services are available.

Measure富山市瑞浪市恵那市
Home-visit care providers148 service providers11 service providers17 service providers
Visiting nursing providers63 service providers7 service providers13 service providers
Day-care providers115 service providers11 service providers9 service providers
Care-management providers150 service providers10 service providers19 service providers
Welfare-facility providers26 service providers3 service providers5 service providers

Projected population

Future values are source-produced projections, not observed future outcomes. Each row retains its stated reference year and observation status.

Measure富山市瑞浪市恵那市
Total population — 2020 (baseline)413,938 people37,150 people47,774 people
Population aged 65 and over — 2020 (baseline)124,012 people11,661 people16,924 people
Population aged 75 and over — 2020 (baseline)64,597 people6,257 people9,113 people
Total population — 2025 (projected)398,075 people35,259 people43,758 people
Population aged 65 and over — 2025 (projected)123,706 people11,634 people16,621 people
Population aged 75 and over — 2025 (projected)75,400 people6,957 people9,937 people
Total population — 2030 (projected)387,415 people33,355 people40,511 people
Population aged 65 and over — 2030 (projected)123,650 people11,635 people16,069 people
Population aged 75 and over — 2030 (projected)77,818 people7,199 people10,172 people
Total population — 2035 (projected)375,859 people31,293 people37,396 people
Population aged 65 and over — 2035 (projected)125,315 people11,612 people15,459 people
Population aged 75 and over — 2035 (projected)75,611 people7,101 people9,919 people
Total population — 2040 (projected)363,524 people29,193 people34,376 people
Population aged 65 and over — 2040 (projected)131,523 people11,647 people15,126 people
Population aged 75 and over — 2040 (projected)73,790 people7,002 people9,482 people
Total population — 2045 (projected)350,742 people27,104 people31,436 people
Population aged 65 and over — 2045 (projected)131,943 people11,392 people14,515 people
Population aged 75 and over — 2045 (projected)74,830 people6,971 people8,976 people
Total population — 2050 (projected)338,229 people25,047 people28,611 people
Population aged 65 and over — 2050 (projected)129,230 people10,957 people13,644 people
Population aged 75 and over — 2050 (projected)81,799 people7,093 people8,854 people

Children, families and related measures

This group brings together measures with different definitions and source periods. A listed specialty or facility record is not evidence of service quality, capacity, availability or access.

This measure reports the source-published capacity as of 1 April 2025. It does not show vacancies or places currently available. Figures published only for a designated city are not allocated to its wards. Where no ward-level figure is verified, no figure is shown; this does not mean zero.

Measure富山市瑞浪市恵那市
Population aged 0–1485,009 people4,187 people9,484 people
Share of population aged 0–1411.83474%11.33736%11.58343%
Facilities with a listed pediatrics entry9 facilities0 facilities — Confirmed zero2 facilities
Physicians whose principal specialty is pediatrics95 people2 people3 people
Facilities with a listed obstetrics and gynecology entry4 facilities0 facilities — Confirmed zero1 facilities
Published childcare enrollment capacity12,526 capacity slots922 capacity slots966 capacity slots
Households with members under 1835,522 households2,957 households3,726 households
Measure富山市瑞浪市恵那市
Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 202048,478 people4,187 people5,503 people
Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 202542,976 people3,690 people4,483 people
Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 203038,906 people3,183 people3,589 people
Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 203536,208 people2,813 people3,077 people
Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 204035,804 people2,568 people2,862 people
Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 204534,826 people2,311 people2,629 people
Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 205032,942 people2,044 people2,354 people

Diagnosis Procedure Combination (DPC) records

DPC is the Diagnosis Procedure Combination diagnosis-group classification used in these records. DPC/PDPS refers to the separate Diagnosis Procedure Combination / Per-Diem Payment System. The categories and patient counts here describe source records and reporting coverage; they are not a quality rating, hospital recommendation or complete measure of care provided.

Measure富山市瑞浪市恵那市
DPC records3212
Reported DPC patient count53,151 people3,274 people2,113 people
Reported emergency admissions16,007 admissions1,536 admissions1,302 admissions
Reported ambulance transports54,077 transports3,402 transports2,191 transports
Measure富山市瑞浪市恵那市
DPC major diagnosis category 0611,238 reported cases (21.14%)835 reported cases (25.5%)482 reported cases (22.81%)
DPC major diagnosis category 046,073 reported cases (11.43%)519 reported cases (15.85%)343 reported cases (16.23%)
DPC major diagnosis category 055,530 reported cases (10.4%)138 reported cases (4.22%)141 reported cases (6.67%)
DPC major diagnosis category 114,487 reported cases (8.44%)546 reported cases (16.68%)134 reported cases (6.34%)
DPC major diagnosis category 024,250 reported cases (8%)164 reported cases (5.01%)223 reported cases (10.55%)
DPC major diagnosis category 163,705 reported cases (6.97%)525 reported cases (16.04%)251 reported cases (11.88%)
DPC major diagnosis category 013,079 reported cases (5.79%)65 reported cases (1.99%)110 reported cases (5.21%)
DPC major diagnosis category 072,944 reported cases (5.54%)170 reported cases (5.19%)30 reported cases (1.42%)
DPC major diagnosis category 032,217 reported cases (4.17%)42 reported cases (1.28%)53 reported cases (2.51%)
DPC major diagnosis category 122,174 reported cases (4.09%)31 reported cases (0.95%)75 reported cases (3.55%)
DPC major diagnosis category 131,891 reported cases (3.56%)27 reported cases (0.82%)28 reported cases (1.33%)
DPC major diagnosis category 101,574 reported cases (2.96%)113 reported cases (3.45%)133 reported cases (6.29%)
DPC major diagnosis category 14947 reported cases (1.78%)Not reported48 reported cases (2.27%)
DPC major diagnosis category 18943 reported cases (1.77%)37 reported cases (1.13%)18 reported cases (0.85%)
DPC major diagnosis category 08938 reported cases (1.76%)51 reported cases (1.56%)23 reported cases (1.09%)
DPC major diagnosis category 09831 reported cases (1.56%)11 reported cases (0.34%)21 reported cases (0.99%)
DPC major diagnosis category 15221 reported cases (0.42%)Not reportedNot reported
DPC major diagnosis category 17109 reported cases (0.21%)Not reportedNot reported

Browse another municipality. Each municipality profile provides its own source details; comparison does not create a combined score or rank.

  • Values are descriptive statistics based on the same published facility snapshot.
  • Facilities with unknown bed counts are excluded from bed mean, median and distribution summaries; missing bed counts are not treated as zero.
  • Numeric differences describe facility composition. They do not indicate healthcare quality, capacity, access, need, adequacy, superiority or rank.
  • Population-denominated measures use the Basic Resident Register reference date as descriptive context; they do not measure need, access, quality, adequacy or superiority.
  • When a municipality has a zero population denominator, rates per 100,000 residents are not displayed, to avoid division by zero.

Sources and reference periods

Diagnosis Procedure Combination (DPC) records

Source agency or portal
Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW)
Reference period
2024-06-01/2025-05-31
Retrieved
24 August 2026 at 18:37:32 UTC

Source titles and official records may be in Japanese. Dates and geographic units are shown separately for each source.

A missing numeric value is not converted to zero. Open a municipality profile to see its source details and geographic context.