Side-by-side comparison

Compare municipality data

Select up to three municipalities and review published measures side by side. Values retain their source periods and geographic basis; the comparison does not rank places or rate healthcare.

Japanese place names are retained when no verified English name is available.

Comparison order

Selected municipalities

3 / 3 selected

The list and columns use a stable municipality-code order. Add or replace a place, remove one or clear the selection; the selected codes stay in this page URL.

  1. 1
    瑞浪市Gifu Prefecture · 21208
  2. 2
    美濃加茂市Gifu Prefecture · 21211
  3. 3
    下呂市Gifu Prefecture · 21220

Published measures

Descriptive values from their stated sources; periods may differ between measures.
Measure瑞浪市
Gifu Prefecture · 21208
Listed facilities
美濃加茂市
Gifu Prefecture · 21211
Listed facilities
下呂市
Gifu Prefecture · 21220
Listed facilities
Listed hospitals (facilities at provider locations)243
Reported beds (beds reported by hospitals)3561,041389
Resident population (people)35,27957,59528,915
Listed hospitals per 100,000 residents5.676.9510.38
Reported beds per 100,000 residents1,009.11,807.451,345.32

“Reported beds” are not licensed, staffed, available or occupied beds. Per-population rates combine provider-location counts with resident-population denominators; they do not measure access or capacity.

Facility profile and published bed measures

Measure瑞浪市美濃加茂市下呂市
Listed hospitals (provider-location count)243
Facilities with a reported bed count243
Reported beds (hospital survey field)356 beds1,041 beds389 beds
Mean reported beds per reporting facility178 beds260.25 beds129.67 beds
Median reported beds per reporting facility178 beds225 beds143 beds
First quartile (Q1) of reported beds113 beds134.75 beds96.5 beds
Third quartile (Q3) of reported beds243 beds350.5 beds169.5 beds

Bed summaries exclude records with unknown bed counts. A missing bed count is not treated as zero. These figures describe the listed facility records and do not measure capacity or access.

Distribution of listed hospitals by reported-bed band

Bands are descriptive groups of reported bed counts. They are not quality ratings or rankings.

Measure瑞浪市美濃加茂市下呂市
0–99 beds111
100–199 beds012
200–399 beds110
400+ beds010

瑞浪市

Hospitals with 400 or more reported beds
0%
Share of reported beds at the three largest facilities
Value not returned

Shares use facilities and bed counts reported in this snapshot; they do not rate places.

美濃加茂市

Hospitals with 400 or more reported beds
25%
Share of reported beds at the three largest facilities
91.45%

Shares use facilities and bed counts reported in this snapshot; they do not rate places.

下呂市

Hospitals with 400 or more reported beds
0%
Share of reported beds at the three largest facilities
100%

Shares use facilities and bed counts reported in this snapshot; they do not rate places.

Housing measures

Housing statistics describe the survey's municipal geography and reference period. They are not healthcare measures.

Measure瑞浪市美濃加茂市下呂市
Housing units16,740 housing units25,510 housing units13,500 housing units
Vacant housing rate17.562724%13.249706%19.703704%
Owner-occupied housing rate78.990964%72.877358%79.605263%
Rented housing rate21.009036%27.122642%20.394737%
Floor area per dwelling127.2 m²109.34 m²144.38 m²
Monthly rent (includes zero-yen responses)45,884 JPY per month39,779 JPY per month25,198 JPY per month

Road traffic safety records

These events are grouped by occurrence-location municipality, not by residents' place of residence or provider location. Counts do not measure individual risk or predict future events.

Measure瑞浪市美濃加茂市下呂市
Road traffic accidents47 cases62 cases21 cases
Road traffic deaths2 people0 people — Confirmed zero4 people
Road traffic injuries56 people71 people29 people

Older population, households and care providers

Resident population

Resident-population geography.

Measure瑞浪市美濃加茂市下呂市
Population aged 65 and over11,639 people12,916 people12,298 people
Population aged 75 and over6,248 people6,554 people7,087 people
Share of population aged 65 and over31.51553%23.89153%40.70299%

Resident household measures

Household geography, based on residents' place of residence.

Measure瑞浪市美濃加茂市下呂市
Single-person households with a householder aged 65 and over1,694 households1,697 households1,706 households

Care providers by provider location

Provider-location geography. Provider counts do not show where residents receive services or whether services are available.

Measure瑞浪市美濃加茂市下呂市
Home-visit care providers11 service providers9 service providers5 service providers
Visiting nursing providers7 service providers10 service providers1 service providers
Day-care providers11 service providers8 service providers6 service providers
Care-management providers10 service providers12 service providers13 service providers
Welfare-facility providers3 service providers2 service providers3 service providers

Projected population

Future values are source-produced projections, not observed future outcomes. Each row retains its stated reference year and observation status.

Measure瑞浪市美濃加茂市下呂市
Total population — 2020 (baseline)37,150 people56,689 people30,428 people
Population aged 65 and over — 2020 (baseline)11,661 people13,288 people12,353 people
Population aged 75 and over — 2020 (baseline)6,257 people6,718 people7,112 people
Total population — 2025 (projected)35,259 people56,972 people26,993 people
Population aged 65 and over — 2025 (projected)11,634 people13,903 people11,759 people
Population aged 75 and over — 2025 (projected)6,957 people7,928 people7,419 people
Total population — 2030 (projected)33,355 people57,093 people24,243 people
Population aged 65 and over — 2030 (projected)11,635 people14,581 people11,157 people
Population aged 75 and over — 2030 (projected)7,199 people8,578 people7,256 people
Total population — 2035 (projected)31,293 people56,846 people21,674 people
Population aged 65 and over — 2035 (projected)11,612 people15,454 people10,417 people
Population aged 75 and over — 2035 (projected)7,101 people8,894 people6,817 people
Total population — 2040 (projected)29,193 people56,198 people19,316 people
Population aged 65 and over — 2040 (projected)11,647 people16,826 people9,873 people
Population aged 75 and over — 2040 (projected)7,002 people9,176 people6,439 people
Total population — 2045 (projected)27,104 people55,212 people17,151 people
Population aged 65 and over — 2045 (projected)11,392 people17,507 people9,123 people
Population aged 75 and over — 2045 (projected)6,971 people9,707 people5,951 people
Total population — 2050 (projected)25,047 people53,983 people15,154 people
Population aged 65 and over — 2050 (projected)10,957 people17,839 people8,213 people
Population aged 75 and over — 2050 (projected)7,093 people10,863 people5,689 people

Children, families and related measures

This group brings together measures with different definitions and source periods. A listed specialty or facility record is not evidence of service quality, capacity, availability or access.

This measure reports the source-published capacity as of 1 April 2025. It does not show vacancies or places currently available. Figures published only for a designated city are not allocated to its wards. Where no ward-level figure is verified, no figure is shown; this does not mean zero.

Measure瑞浪市美濃加茂市下呂市
Population aged 0–144,187 people8,277 people3,246 people
Share of population aged 0–1411.33736%15.31048%10.74336%
Facilities with a listed pediatrics entry0 facilities — Confirmed zero2 facilities2 facilities
Physicians whose principal specialty is pediatrics2 people9 people2 people
Facilities with a listed obstetrics and gynecology entry0 facilities — Confirmed zero1 facilities1 facilities
Published childcare enrollment capacity922 capacity slots1,861 capacity slots588 capacity slots
Households with members under 182,957 households5,720 households2,154 households
Measure瑞浪市美濃加茂市下呂市
Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 20204,187 people8,590 people3,264 people
Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 20253,690 people8,141 people2,584 people
Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 20303,183 people7,652 people2,036 people
Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 20352,813 people7,507 people1,639 people
Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 20402,568 people7,496 people1,446 people
Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 20452,311 people7,375 people1,295 people
Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 20502,044 people7,040 people1,160 people

Diagnosis Procedure Combination (DPC) records

DPC is the Diagnosis Procedure Combination diagnosis-group classification used in these records. DPC/PDPS refers to the separate Diagnosis Procedure Combination / Per-Diem Payment System. The categories and patient counts here describe source records and reporting coverage; they are not a quality rating, hospital recommendation or complete measure of care provided.

Measure瑞浪市美濃加茂市下呂市
DPC records142
Reported DPC patient count3,274 people12,294 people1,057 people
Reported emergency admissions1,536 admissions3,586 admissions244 admissions
Reported ambulance transports3,402 transports12,487 transports1,163 transports
Measure瑞浪市美濃加茂市下呂市
DPC major diagnosis category 06835 reported cases (25.5%)2,817 reported cases (22.91%)447 reported cases (42.29%)
DPC major diagnosis category 11546 reported cases (16.68%)1,440 reported cases (11.71%)49 reported cases (4.64%)
DPC major diagnosis category 16525 reported cases (16.04%)699 reported cases (5.69%)137 reported cases (12.96%)
DPC major diagnosis category 04519 reported cases (15.85%)1,512 reported cases (12.3%)136 reported cases (12.87%)
DPC major diagnosis category 07170 reported cases (5.19%)597 reported cases (4.86%)51 reported cases (4.82%)
DPC major diagnosis category 02164 reported cases (5.01%)468 reported cases (3.81%)Not reported
DPC major diagnosis category 05138 reported cases (4.22%)1,440 reported cases (11.71%)111 reported cases (10.5%)
DPC major diagnosis category 10113 reported cases (3.45%)370 reported cases (3.01%)43 reported cases (4.07%)
DPC major diagnosis category 0165 reported cases (1.99%)643 reported cases (5.23%)29 reported cases (2.74%)
DPC major diagnosis category 0851 reported cases (1.56%)279 reported cases (2.27%)Not reported
DPC major diagnosis category 0342 reported cases (1.28%)695 reported cases (5.65%)14 reported cases (1.32%)
DPC major diagnosis category 1837 reported cases (1.13%)134 reported cases (1.09%)Not reported
DPC major diagnosis category 1231 reported cases (0.95%)696 reported cases (5.66%)Not reported
DPC major diagnosis category 1327 reported cases (0.82%)57 reported cases (0.46%)Not reported
DPC major diagnosis category 0911 reported cases (0.34%)227 reported cases (1.85%)40 reported cases (3.78%)
DPC major diagnosis category 14Not reported174 reported cases (1.42%)Not reported
DPC major diagnosis category 15Not reported46 reported cases (0.37%)Not reported

Browse another municipality. Each municipality profile provides its own source details; comparison does not create a combined score or rank.

  • Values are descriptive statistics based on the same published facility snapshot.
  • Facilities with unknown bed counts are excluded from bed mean, median and distribution summaries; missing bed counts are not treated as zero.
  • Numeric differences describe facility composition. They do not indicate healthcare quality, capacity, access, need, adequacy, superiority or rank.
  • Population-denominated measures use the Basic Resident Register reference date as descriptive context; they do not measure need, access, quality, adequacy or superiority.
  • When a municipality has a zero population denominator, rates per 100,000 residents are not displayed, to avoid division by zero.

Sources and reference periods

Diagnosis Procedure Combination (DPC) records

Source agency or portal
Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW)
Reference period
2024-06-01/2025-05-31
Retrieved
24 August 2026 at 18:37:32 UTC

Source titles and official records may be in Japanese. Dates and geographic units are shown separately for each source.

A missing numeric value is not converted to zero. Open a municipality profile to see its source details and geographic context.