恵那市
- Hospitals with 400 or more reported beds
- 0%
- Share of reported beds at the three largest facilities
- Value not returned
Shares use facilities and bed counts reported in this snapshot; they do not rate places.
Side-by-side comparison
Compare municipality data
Select up to three municipalities and review published measures side by side. Values retain their source periods and geographic basis; the comparison does not rank places or rate healthcare.
Comparison order
Selected municipalities
The list and columns use a stable municipality-code order. Add or replace a place, remove one or clear the selection; the selected codes stay in this page URL.
- 1恵那市Gifu Prefecture · 21210
- 2土岐市Gifu Prefecture · 21212
- 3可児市Gifu Prefecture · 21214
Published measures
| Measure | 恵那市 Gifu Prefecture · 21210 Listed facilities | 土岐市 Gifu Prefecture · 21212 Listed facilities | 可児市 Gifu Prefecture · 21214 Listed facilities |
|---|---|---|---|
| Listed hospitals (facilities at provider locations) | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| Reported beds (beds reported by hospitals) | 255 | 259 | 483 |
| Resident population (people) | 46,054 | 54,243 | 99,779 |
| Listed hospitals per 100,000 residents | 4.34 | 3.69 | 4.01 |
| Reported beds per 100,000 residents | 553.7 | 477.48 | 484.07 |
“Reported beds” are not licensed, staffed, available or occupied beds. Per-population rates combine provider-location counts with resident-population denominators; they do not measure access or capacity.
Facility profile and published bed measures
| Measure | 恵那市 | 土岐市 | 可児市 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Listed hospitals (provider-location count) | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| Facilities with a reported bed count | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| Reported beds (hospital survey field) | 255 beds | 259 beds | 483 beds |
| Mean reported beds per reporting facility | 127.5 beds | 129.5 beds | 120.75 beds |
| Median reported beds per reporting facility | 127.5 beds | 129.5 beds | 120 beds |
| First quartile (Q1) of reported beds | 91.75 beds | 94.75 beds | 59.75 beds |
| Third quartile (Q3) of reported beds | 163.25 beds | 164.25 beds | 181 beds |
Bed summaries exclude records with unknown bed counts. A missing bed count is not treated as zero. These figures describe the listed facility records and do not measure capacity or access.
Distribution of listed hospitals by reported-bed band
Bands are descriptive groups of reported bed counts. They are not quality ratings or rankings.
| Measure | 恵那市 | 土岐市 | 可児市 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–99 beds | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| 100–199 beds | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| 200–399 beds | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 400+ beds | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Housing measures
Housing statistics describe the survey's municipal geography and reference period. They are not healthcare measures.
| Measure | 恵那市 | 土岐市 | 可児市 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Housing units | 21,660 housing units | 25,190 housing units | 45,730 housing units |
| Vacant housing rate | 18.651893% | 15.839619% | 10.780669% |
| Owner-occupied housing rate | 84.782609% | 82.422452% | 75.723999% |
| Rented housing rate | 15.217391% | 17.577548% | 24.276001% |
| Floor area per dwelling | 138.62 m² | 121.66 m² | 108.67 m² |
| Monthly rent (includes zero-yen responses) | 36,054 JPY per month | 42,008 JPY per month | 51,107 JPY per month |
Road traffic safety records
These events are grouped by occurrence-location municipality, not by residents' place of residence or provider location. Counts do not measure individual risk or predict future events.
| Measure | 恵那市 | 土岐市 | 可児市 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Road traffic accidents | 61 cases | 78 cases | 100 cases |
| Road traffic deaths | 3 people | 4 people | 2 people |
| Road traffic injuries | 71 people | 109 people | 118 people |
Older population, households and care providers
Resident population
Resident-population geography.
| Measure | 恵那市 | 土岐市 | 可児市 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Population aged 65 and over | 16,856 people | 17,692 people | 27,764 people |
| Population aged 75 and over | 9,076 people | 9,487 people | 13,154 people |
| Share of population aged 65 and over | 35.5065% | 32.0955% | 28.20685% |
Resident household measures
Household geography, based on residents' place of residence.
| Measure | 恵那市 | 土岐市 | 可児市 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Single-person households with a householder aged 65 and over | 2,365 households | 2,597 households | 3,650 households |
Care providers by provider location
Provider-location geography. Provider counts do not show where residents receive services or whether services are available.
| Measure | 恵那市 | 土岐市 | 可児市 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Home-visit care providers | 17 service providers | 13 service providers | 25 service providers |
| Visiting nursing providers | 13 service providers | 6 service providers | 15 service providers |
| Day-care providers | 9 service providers | 20 service providers | 25 service providers |
| Care-management providers | 19 service providers | 16 service providers | 23 service providers |
| Welfare-facility providers | 5 service providers | 2 service providers | 4 service providers |
Projected population
Future values are source-produced projections, not observed future outcomes. Each row retains its stated reference year and observation status.
| Measure | 恵那市 | 土岐市 | 可児市 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total population — 2020 (baseline) | 47,774 people | 55,348 people | 99,968 people |
| Population aged 65 and over — 2020 (baseline) | 16,924 people | 17,734 people | 28,048 people |
| Population aged 75 and over — 2020 (baseline) | 9,113 people | 9,504 people | 13,281 people |
| Total population — 2025 (projected) | 43,758 people | 51,792 people | 98,689 people |
| Population aged 65 and over — 2025 (projected) | 16,621 people | 17,403 people | 29,093 people |
| Population aged 75 and over — 2025 (projected) | 9,937 people | 10,479 people | 17,158 people |
| Total population — 2030 (projected) | 40,511 people | 48,849 people | 96,470 people |
| Population aged 65 and over — 2030 (projected) | 16,069 people | 17,273 people | 29,599 people |
| Population aged 75 and over — 2030 (projected) | 10,172 people | 10,520 people | 18,612 people |
| Total population — 2035 (projected) | 37,396 people | 45,816 people | 93,694 people |
| Population aged 65 and over — 2035 (projected) | 15,459 people | 16,970 people | 30,245 people |
| Population aged 75 and over — 2035 (projected) | 9,919 people | 10,125 people | 18,478 people |
| Total population — 2040 (projected) | 34,376 people | 42,805 people | 90,554 people |
| Population aged 65 and over — 2040 (projected) | 15,126 people | 17,007 people | 31,788 people |
| Population aged 75 and over — 2040 (projected) | 9,482 people | 9,960 people | 18,098 people |
| Total population — 2045 (projected) | 31,436 people | 39,922 people | 87,227 people |
| Population aged 65 and over — 2045 (projected) | 14,515 people | 16,601 people | 32,268 people |
| Population aged 75 and over — 2045 (projected) | 8,976 people | 9,835 people | 18,323 people |
| Total population — 2050 (projected) | 28,611 people | 37,104 people | 83,832 people |
| Population aged 65 and over — 2050 (projected) | 13,644 people | 15,879 people | 32,109 people |
| Population aged 75 and over — 2050 (projected) | 8,854 people | 10,094 people | 19,898 people |
Children, families and related measures
This group brings together measures with different definitions and source periods. A listed specialty or facility record is not evidence of service quality, capacity, availability or access.
This measure reports the source-published capacity as of 1 April 2025. It does not show vacancies or places currently available. Figures published only for a designated city are not allocated to its wards. Where no ward-level figure is verified, no figure is shown; this does not mean zero.
| Measure | 恵那市 | 土岐市 | 可児市 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Population aged 0–14 | 9,484 people | 6,553 people | 25,757 people |
| Share of population aged 0–14 | 11.58343% | 11.88796% | 13.15554% |
| Facilities with a listed pediatrics entry | 2 facilities | 0 facilities — Confirmed zero | 3 facilities |
| Physicians whose principal specialty is pediatrics | 3 people | 4 people | 7 people |
| Facilities with a listed obstetrics and gynecology entry | 1 facilities | 0 facilities — Confirmed zero | 0 facilities — Confirmed zero |
| Published childcare enrollment capacity | 966 capacity slots | 1,362 capacity slots | 1,549 capacity slots |
| Households with members under 18 | 3,726 households | 4,550 households | 9,253 households |
| Measure | 恵那市 | 土岐市 | 可児市 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 2020 | 5,503 people | 6,573 people | 12,971 people |
| Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 2025 | 4,483 people | 5,693 people | 11,627 people |
| Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 2030 | 3,589 people | 4,840 people | 10,305 people |
| Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 2035 | 3,077 people | 4,295 people | 9,792 people |
| Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 2040 | 2,862 people | 4,024 people | 9,534 people |
| Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 2045 | 2,629 people | 3,763 people | 9,178 people |
| Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 2050 | 2,354 people | 3,468 people | 8,587 people |
Diagnosis Procedure Combination (DPC) records
DPC is the Diagnosis Procedure Combination diagnosis-group classification used in these records. DPC/PDPS refers to the separate Diagnosis Procedure Combination / Per-Diem Payment System. The categories and patient counts here describe source records and reporting coverage; they are not a quality rating, hospital recommendation or complete measure of care provided.
| Measure | 恵那市 | 土岐市 | 可児市 |
|---|---|---|---|
| DPC records | 2 | 3 | 3 |
| Reported DPC patient count | 2,113 people | 948 people | 3,169 people |
| Reported emergency admissions | 1,302 admissions | 873 admissions | 698 admissions |
| Reported ambulance transports | 2,191 transports | 1,037 transports | 3,423 transports |
| Measure | 恵那市 | 土岐市 | 可児市 |
|---|---|---|---|
| DPC major diagnosis category 06 | 482 reported cases (22.81%) | 107 reported cases (11.29%) | 813 reported cases (25.65%) |
| DPC major diagnosis category 04 | 343 reported cases (16.23%) | 177 reported cases (18.67%) | 468 reported cases (14.77%) |
| DPC major diagnosis category 16 | 251 reported cases (11.88%) | 92 reported cases (9.7%) | 446 reported cases (14.07%) |
| DPC major diagnosis category 02 | 223 reported cases (10.55%) | Not reported | 183 reported cases (5.77%) |
| DPC major diagnosis category 05 | 141 reported cases (6.67%) | 22 reported cases (2.32%) | 266 reported cases (8.39%) |
| DPC major diagnosis category 11 | 134 reported cases (6.34%) | 63 reported cases (6.65%) | 359 reported cases (11.33%) |
| DPC major diagnosis category 10 | 133 reported cases (6.29%) | 36 reported cases (3.8%) | 95 reported cases (3%) |
| DPC major diagnosis category 01 | 110 reported cases (5.21%) | 344 reported cases (36.29%) | 269 reported cases (8.49%) |
| DPC major diagnosis category 12 | 75 reported cases (3.55%) | Not reported | Not reported |
| DPC major diagnosis category 03 | 53 reported cases (2.51%) | 22 reported cases (2.32%) | 56 reported cases (1.77%) |
| DPC major diagnosis category 14 | 48 reported cases (2.27%) | Not reported | Not reported |
| DPC major diagnosis category 07 | 30 reported cases (1.42%) | 32 reported cases (3.38%) | 66 reported cases (2.08%) |
| DPC major diagnosis category 13 | 28 reported cases (1.33%) | 36 reported cases (3.8%) | 67 reported cases (2.11%) |
| DPC major diagnosis category 08 | 23 reported cases (1.09%) | Not reported | 25 reported cases (0.79%) |
| DPC major diagnosis category 09 | 21 reported cases (0.99%) | Not reported | Not reported |
| DPC major diagnosis category 18 | 18 reported cases (0.85%) | 17 reported cases (1.79%) | 56 reported cases (1.77%) |
Browse another municipality. Each municipality profile provides its own source details; comparison does not create a combined score or rank.
- Values are descriptive statistics based on the same published facility snapshot.
- Facilities with unknown bed counts are excluded from bed mean, median and distribution summaries; missing bed counts are not treated as zero.
- Numeric differences describe facility composition. They do not indicate healthcare quality, capacity, access, need, adequacy, superiority or rank.
- Population-denominated measures use the Basic Resident Register reference date as descriptive context; they do not measure need, access, quality, adequacy or superiority.
- When a municipality has a zero population denominator, rates per 100,000 residents are not displayed, to avoid division by zero.
Sources and reference periods
Hospital facility data
- Source agency or portal
- Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW)
- Reference period
- 1 June 2026
- Retrieved
- 22 August 2026 at 03:30:08 UTC
Municipality directory
- Source agency or portal
- Government Statistics Portal (e-Stat) / Statistics Bureau of Japan
- Reference period
- 1 June 2026
- Retrieved
- 24 August 2026 at 02:13:46 UTC
Resident population
- Source agency or portal
- Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications / Government Statistics Portal (e-Stat)
- Reference period
- 2025
- Retrieved
- 24 August 2026 at 04:43:28 UTC
Diagnosis Procedure Combination (DPC) records
- Source agency or portal
- Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW)
- Reference period
- 2024-06-01/2025-05-31
- Retrieved
- 24 August 2026 at 18:37:32 UTC
Secondary medical area mapping
- Source agency or portal
- Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare / Government Statistics Portal (e-Stat)
- Reference period
- 1 October 2024
- Retrieved
- 24 August 2026 at 21:55:08 UTC
Source titles and official records may be in Japanese. Dates and geographic units are shown separately for each source.
A missing numeric value is not converted to zero. Open a municipality profile to see its source details and geographic context.