MedOpenMedical open data for Japan
Explore

Side-by-side comparison

Compare municipality data

Select up to three municipalities and review published measures side by side. Values retain their source periods and geographic basis; the comparison does not rank places or rate healthcare.

Japanese place names are retained when no verified English name is available.

Comparison order

Selected municipalities

3 / 3 selected

The list and columns use a stable municipality-code order. Add or replace a place, remove one or clear the selection; the selected codes stay in this page URL.

  1. 1
    名古屋市 / 中村区Aichi Prefecture · 23105
  2. 2
    名古屋市 / 昭和区Aichi Prefecture · 23107
  3. 3
    名古屋市 / 瑞穂区Aichi Prefecture · 23108
Clear all selected places

Published measures

Descriptive values from their stated sources; periods may differ between measures.
Measure名古屋市 / 中村区
Aichi Prefecture · 23105
Listed facilities		名古屋市 / 昭和区
Aichi Prefecture · 23107
Listed facilities		名古屋市 / 瑞穂区
Aichi Prefecture · 23108
Listed facilities
Listed hospitals (facilities at provider locations)1066
Reported beds (beds reported by hospitals)2,0312,2961,104
Resident population (people)137,948106,491107,751
Listed hospitals per 100,000 residents7.255.635.57
Reported beds per 100,000 residents1,472.292,156.051,024.58

“Reported beds” are not licensed, staffed, available or occupied beds. Per-population rates combine provider-location counts with resident-population denominators; they do not measure access or capacity.

Facility profile and published bed measures

Measure名古屋市 / 中村区名古屋市 / 昭和区名古屋市 / 瑞穂区
Listed hospitals (provider-location count)1066
Facilities with a reported bed count1066
Reported beds (hospital survey field)2,031 beds2,296 beds1,104 beds
Mean reported beds per reporting facility203.1 beds382.67 beds184 beds
Median reported beds per reporting facility135 beds182.5 beds69.5 beds
First quartile (Q1) of reported beds106.5 beds82.5 beds40.25 beds
Third quartile (Q3) of reported beds204.75 beds621.5 beds94.25 beds

Bed summaries exclude records with unknown bed counts. A missing bed count is not treated as zero. These figures describe the listed facility records and do not measure capacity or access.

Distribution of listed hospitals by reported-bed band

Bands are descriptive groups of reported bed counts. They are not quality ratings or rankings.

Measure名古屋市 / 中村区名古屋市 / 昭和区名古屋市 / 瑞穂区
0–99 beds225
100–199 beds520
200–399 beds200
400+ beds121

名古屋市 / 中村区

Hospitals with 400 or more reported beds
10%
Share of reported beds at the three largest facilities
61.4%

Shares use facilities and bed counts reported in this snapshot; they do not rate places.

名古屋市 / 昭和区

Hospitals with 400 or more reported beds
33.33%
Share of reported beds at the three largest facilities
88.59%

Shares use facilities and bed counts reported in this snapshot; they do not rate places.

名古屋市 / 瑞穂区

Hospitals with 400 or more reported beds
16.67%
Share of reported beds at the three largest facilities
88.68%

Shares use facilities and bed counts reported in this snapshot; they do not rate places.

Housing measures

Housing statistics describe the survey's municipal geography and reference period. They are not healthcare measures.

Measure名古屋市 / 中村区名古屋市 / 昭和区名古屋市 / 瑞穂区
Housing units95,190 housing units63,430 housing units58,450 housing units
Vacant housing rate15.48482%13.905092%11.360137%
Owner-occupied housing rate37.965362%47.965006%53.630952%
Rented housing rate62.034638%52.034994%46.369048%
Floor area per dwelling71.09 m²75.21 m²80.02 m²
Monthly rent (includes zero-yen responses)60,219 JPY per month64,621 JPY per month59,716 JPY per month

Road traffic safety records

These events are grouped by occurrence-location municipality, not by residents' place of residence or provider location. Counts do not measure individual risk or predict future events.

Measure名古屋市 / 中村区名古屋市 / 昭和区名古屋市 / 瑞穂区
Road traffic accidents780 cases335 cases313 cases
Road traffic deaths1 people1 people1 people
Road traffic injuries943 people374 people373 people

Older population, households and care providers

Resident population

Resident-population geography.

Measure名古屋市 / 中村区名古屋市 / 昭和区名古屋市 / 瑞穂区
Population aged 65 and over35,868 people25,086 people26,996 people
Population aged 75 and over19,591 people13,258 people14,204 people
Share of population aged 65 and over27.16182%23.96057%28.03469%

Resident household measures

Household geography, based on residents' place of residence.

Measure名古屋市 / 中村区名古屋市 / 昭和区名古屋市 / 瑞穂区
Single-person households with a householder aged 65 and over9,739 households6,274 households6,431 households

Care providers by provider location

Provider-location geography. Provider counts do not show where residents receive services or whether services are available.

Measure名古屋市 / 中村区名古屋市 / 昭和区名古屋市 / 瑞穂区
Home-visit care providers70 service providers50 service providers40 service providers
Visiting nursing providers42 service providers32 service providers30 service providers
Day-care providers28 service providers13 service providers13 service providers
Care-management providers43 service providers28 service providers30 service providers
Welfare-facility providers5 service providers3 service providers5 service providers

Projected population

Future values are source-produced projections, not observed future outcomes. Each row retains its stated reference year and observation status.

Measure名古屋市 / 中村区名古屋市 / 昭和区名古屋市 / 瑞穂区
Total population — 2020 (baseline)138,599 people107,599 people108,332 people
Population aged 65 and over — 2020 (baseline)37,421 people25,424 people29,453 people
Population aged 75 and over — 2020 (baseline)20,424 people13,470 people15,397 people
Total population — 2025 (projected)138,455 people107,820 people108,257 people
Population aged 65 and over — 2025 (projected)36,650 people25,708 people29,953 people
Population aged 75 and over — 2025 (projected)22,588 people14,987 people17,740 people
Total population — 2030 (projected)136,431 people107,118 people107,268 people
Population aged 65 and over — 2030 (projected)36,392 people26,456 people30,738 people
Population aged 75 and over — 2030 (projected)21,863 people15,260 people18,252 people
Total population — 2035 (projected)134,380 people106,011 people105,945 people
Population aged 65 and over — 2035 (projected)36,813 people27,454 people31,501 people
Population aged 75 and over — 2035 (projected)20,505 people15,241 people18,118 people
Total population — 2040 (projected)132,042 people104,182 people104,157 people
Population aged 65 and over — 2040 (projected)38,492 people28,911 people33,095 people
Population aged 75 and over — 2040 (projected)20,449 people15,751 people18,496 people
Total population — 2045 (projected)129,227 people101,800 people101,970 people
Population aged 65 and over — 2045 (projected)39,183 people29,518 people33,629 people
Population aged 75 and over — 2045 (projected)21,320 people16,642 people19,159 people
Total population — 2050 (projected)126,110 people99,364 people99,531 people
Population aged 65 and over — 2050 (projected)39,437 people29,843 people33,767 people
Population aged 75 and over — 2050 (projected)23,336 people18,034 people20,751 people

Children, families and related measures

This group brings together measures with different definitions and source periods. A listed specialty or facility record is not evidence of service quality, capacity, availability or access.

This measure reports the source-published capacity as of 1 April 2025. It does not show vacancies or places currently available. Figures published only for a designated city are not allocated to its wards. Where no ward-level figure is verified, no figure is shown; this does not mean zero.

Measure名古屋市 / 中村区名古屋市 / 昭和区名古屋市 / 瑞穂区
Population aged 0–1412,848 people13,014 people12,066 people
Share of population aged 0–149.72943%12.43016%12.53025%
Facilities with a listed pediatrics entry2 facilities3 facilities2 facilities
Physicians whose principal specialty is pediatrics32 people100 people41 people
Facilities with a listed obstetrics and gynecology entry1 facilities3 facilities1 facilities
Published childcare enrollment capacityNot observedNot observedNot observed
Households with members under 189,355 households9,305 households8,735 households
Measure名古屋市 / 中村区名古屋市 / 昭和区名古屋市 / 瑞穂区
Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 202012,854 people13,015 people13,212 people
Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 202512,710 people12,822 people13,009 people
Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 203012,439 people12,314 people12,435 people
Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 203512,483 people11,998 people12,026 people
Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 204012,138 people11,920 people11,932 people
Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 204511,666 people11,646 people11,683 people
Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 205010,978 people11,114 people11,175 people

Diagnosis Procedure Combination (DPC) records

DPC is the Diagnosis Procedure Combination diagnosis-group classification used in these records. DPC/PDPS refers to the separate Diagnosis Procedure Combination / Per-Diem Payment System. The categories and patient counts here describe source records and reporting coverage; they are not a quality rating, hospital recommendation or complete measure of care provided.

Measure名古屋市 / 中村区名古屋市 / 昭和区名古屋市 / 瑞穂区
DPC records854
Reported DPC patient count25,562 people43,406 people17,987 people
Reported emergency admissions7,000 admissions9,355 admissions2,212 admissions
Reported ambulance transports26,205 transports45,690 transports19,080 transports
Measure名古屋市 / 中村区名古屋市 / 昭和区名古屋市 / 瑞穂区
DPC major diagnosis category 065,826 reported cases (22.79%)9,832 reported cases (22.65%)4,862 reported cases (27.03%)
DPC major diagnosis category 043,335 reported cases (13.05%)4,704 reported cases (10.84%)1,729 reported cases (9.61%)
DPC major diagnosis category 112,692 reported cases (10.53%)3,761 reported cases (8.66%)1,720 reported cases (9.56%)
DPC major diagnosis category 052,414 reported cases (9.44%)4,439 reported cases (10.23%)1,227 reported cases (6.82%)
DPC major diagnosis category 121,779 reported cases (6.96%)3,013 reported cases (6.94%)782 reported cases (4.35%)
DPC major diagnosis category 161,723 reported cases (6.74%)2,156 reported cases (4.97%)669 reported cases (3.72%)
DPC major diagnosis category 011,418 reported cases (5.55%)2,726 reported cases (6.28%)1,242 reported cases (6.9%)
DPC major diagnosis category 031,292 reported cases (5.05%)1,634 reported cases (3.76%)1,055 reported cases (5.87%)
DPC major diagnosis category 07972 reported cases (3.8%)2,306 reported cases (5.31%)1,099 reported cases (6.11%)
DPC major diagnosis category 13943 reported cases (3.69%)1,142 reported cases (2.63%)597 reported cases (3.32%)
DPC major diagnosis category 09832 reported cases (3.25%)802 reported cases (1.85%)369 reported cases (2.05%)
DPC major diagnosis category 10690 reported cases (2.7%)1,730 reported cases (3.99%)460 reported cases (2.56%)
DPC major diagnosis category 14555 reported cases (2.17%)1,222 reported cases (2.82%)431 reported cases (2.4%)
DPC major diagnosis category 18431 reported cases (1.69%)590 reported cases (1.36%)252 reported cases (1.4%)
DPC major diagnosis category 02289 reported cases (1.13%)2,518 reported cases (5.8%)854 reported cases (4.75%)
DPC major diagnosis category 08251 reported cases (0.98%)639 reported cases (1.47%)607 reported cases (3.37%)
DPC major diagnosis category 15120 reported cases (0.47%)158 reported cases (0.36%)32 reported cases (0.18%)
DPC major diagnosis category 17Not reported34 reported cases (0.08%)Not reported

Browse another municipality. Each municipality profile provides its own source details; comparison does not create a combined score or rank.

  • Values are descriptive statistics based on the same published facility snapshot.
  • Facilities with unknown bed counts are excluded from bed mean, median and distribution summaries; missing bed counts are not treated as zero.
  • Numeric differences describe facility composition. They do not indicate healthcare quality, capacity, access, need, adequacy, superiority or rank.
  • Population-denominated measures use the Basic Resident Register reference date as descriptive context; they do not measure need, access, quality, adequacy or superiority.
  • When a municipality has a zero population denominator, rates per 100,000 residents are not displayed, to avoid division by zero.

Sources and reference periods

Diagnosis Procedure Combination (DPC) records

Source agency or portal
Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW)
Reference period
2024-06-01/2025-05-31
Retrieved
24 August 2026 at 18:37:32 UTC

Official source (Japanese)

Source titles and official records may be in Japanese. Dates and geographic units are shown separately for each source.

A missing numeric value is not converted to zero. Open a municipality profile to see its source details and geographic context.