名古屋市 / 昭和区
- Hospitals with 400 or more reported beds
- 33.33%
- Share of reported beds at the three largest facilities
- 88.59%
Shares use facilities and bed counts reported in this snapshot; they do not rate places.
Side-by-side comparison
Select up to three municipalities and review published measures side by side. Values retain their source periods and geographic basis; the comparison does not rank places or rate healthcare.
The list and columns use a stable municipality-code order. Add or replace a place, remove one or clear the selection; the selected codes stay in this page URL.
| Measure | 名古屋市 / 昭和区 Aichi Prefecture · 23107 Listed facilities | 刈谷市 Aichi Prefecture · 23210 Listed facilities |
|---|---|---|
| Listed hospitals (facilities at provider locations) | 6 | 7 |
| Reported beds (beds reported by hospitals) | 2,296 | 1,484 |
| Resident population (people) | 106,491 | 152,984 |
| Listed hospitals per 100,000 residents | 5.63 | 4.58 |
| Reported beds per 100,000 residents | 2,156.05 | 970.04 |
“Reported beds” are not licensed, staffed, available or occupied beds. Per-population rates combine provider-location counts with resident-population denominators; they do not measure access or capacity.
| Measure | 名古屋市 / 昭和区 | 刈谷市 |
|---|---|---|
| Listed hospitals (provider-location count) | 6 | 7 |
| Facilities with a reported bed count | 6 | 7 |
| Reported beds (hospital survey field) | 2,296 beds | 1,484 beds |
| Mean reported beds per reporting facility | 382.67 beds | 212 beds |
| Median reported beds per reporting facility | 182.5 beds | 155 beds |
| First quartile (Q1) of reported beds | 82.5 beds | 100 beds |
| Third quartile (Q3) of reported beds | 621.5 beds | 202.5 beds |
Bed summaries exclude records with unknown bed counts. A missing bed count is not treated as zero. These figures describe the listed facility records and do not measure capacity or access.
Bands are descriptive groups of reported bed counts. They are not quality ratings or rankings.
| Measure | 名古屋市 / 昭和区 | 刈谷市 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–99 beds | 2 | 2 |
| 100–199 beds | 2 | 3 |
| 200–399 beds | 0 | 1 |
| 400+ beds | 2 | 1 |
These are descriptive numerical differences based on this comparison. They do not imply that either place is better, worse, adequately served or underserved.
Housing statistics describe the survey's municipal geography and reference period. They are not healthcare measures.
| Measure | 名古屋市 / 昭和区 | 刈谷市 |
|---|---|---|
| Housing units | 63,430 housing units | 73,500 housing units |
| Vacant housing rate | 13.905092% | 10.598639% |
| Owner-occupied housing rate | 47.965006% | 59.652174% |
| Rented housing rate | 52.034994% | 40.347826% |
| Floor area per dwelling | 75.21 m² | 93.48 m² |
| Monthly rent (includes zero-yen responses) | 64,621 JPY per month | 54,730 JPY per month |
These events are grouped by occurrence-location municipality, not by residents' place of residence or provider location. Counts do not measure individual risk or predict future events.
| Measure | 名古屋市 / 昭和区 | 刈谷市 |
|---|---|---|
| Road traffic accidents | 335 cases | 534 cases |
| Road traffic deaths | 1 people | 2 people |
| Road traffic injuries | 374 people | 654 people |
Resident-population geography.
| Measure | 名古屋市 / 昭和区 | 刈谷市 |
|---|---|---|
| Population aged 65 and over | 25,086 people | 31,028 people |
| Population aged 75 and over | 13,258 people | 15,141 people |
| Share of population aged 65 and over | 23.96057% | 20.91738% |
Household geography, based on residents' place of residence.
| Measure | 名古屋市 / 昭和区 | 刈谷市 |
|---|---|---|
| Single-person households with a householder aged 65 and over | 6,274 households | 5,279 households |
Provider-location geography. Provider counts do not show where residents receive services or whether services are available.
| Measure | 名古屋市 / 昭和区 | 刈谷市 |
|---|---|---|
| Home-visit care providers | 50 service providers | 33 service providers |
| Visiting nursing providers | 32 service providers | 22 service providers |
| Day-care providers | 13 service providers | 26 service providers |
| Care-management providers | 28 service providers | 30 service providers |
| Welfare-facility providers | 3 service providers | 5 service providers |
Future values are source-produced projections, not observed future outcomes. Each row retains its stated reference year and observation status.
| Measure | 名古屋市 / 昭和区 | 刈谷市 |
|---|---|---|
| Total population — 2020 (baseline) | 107,599 people | 153,834 people |
| Population aged 65 and over — 2020 (baseline) | 25,424 people | 31,748 people |
| Population aged 75 and over — 2020 (baseline) | 13,470 people | 15,479 people |
| Total population — 2025 (projected) | 107,820 people | 155,197 people |
| Population aged 65 and over — 2025 (projected) | 25,708 people | 33,261 people |
| Population aged 75 and over — 2025 (projected) | 14,987 people | 19,236 people |
| Total population — 2030 (projected) | 107,118 people | 154,984 people |
| Population aged 65 and over — 2030 (projected) | 26,456 people | 35,688 people |
| Population aged 75 and over — 2030 (projected) | 15,260 people | 20,733 people |
| Total population — 2035 (projected) | 106,011 people | 153,925 people |
| Population aged 65 and over — 2035 (projected) | 27,454 people | 38,755 people |
| Population aged 75 and over — 2035 (projected) | 15,241 people | 21,005 people |
| Total population — 2040 (projected) | 104,182 people | 151,845 people |
| Population aged 65 and over — 2040 (projected) | 28,911 people | 42,532 people |
| Population aged 75 and over — 2040 (projected) | 15,751 people | 22,210 people |
| Total population — 2045 (projected) | 101,800 people | 148,880 people |
| Population aged 65 and over — 2045 (projected) | 29,518 people | 44,422 people |
| Population aged 75 and over — 2045 (projected) | 16,642 people | 24,359 people |
| Total population — 2050 (projected) | 99,364 people | 145,393 people |
| Population aged 65 and over — 2050 (projected) | 29,843 people | 45,485 people |
| Population aged 75 and over — 2050 (projected) | 18,034 people | 27,561 people |
This group brings together measures with different definitions and source periods. A listed specialty or facility record is not evidence of service quality, capacity, availability or access.
This measure reports the source-published capacity as of 1 April 2025. It does not show vacancies or places currently available. Figures published only for a designated city are not allocated to its wards. Where no ward-level figure is verified, no figure is shown; this does not mean zero.
| Measure | 名古屋市 / 昭和区 | 刈谷市 |
|---|---|---|
| Population aged 0–14 | 13,014 people | 20,887 people |
| Share of population aged 0–14 | 12.43016% | 14.08087% |
| Facilities with a listed pediatrics entry | 3 facilities | 1 facilities |
| Physicians whose principal specialty is pediatrics | 100 people | 17 people |
| Facilities with a listed obstetrics and gynecology entry | 3 facilities | 1 facilities |
| Published childcare enrollment capacity | Not observed | 3,656 capacity slots |
| Households with members under 18 | 9,305 households | 14,714 households |
| Measure | 名古屋市 / 昭和区 | 刈谷市 |
|---|---|---|
| Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 2020 | 13,015 people | 21,307 people |
| Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 2025 | 12,822 people | 19,960 people |
| Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 2030 | 12,314 people | 18,405 people |
| Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 2035 | 11,998 people | 17,915 people |
| Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 2040 | 11,920 people | 17,696 people |
| Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 2045 | 11,646 people | 17,229 people |
| Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 2050 | 11,114 people | 16,330 people |
DPC is the Diagnosis Procedure Combination diagnosis-group classification used in these records. DPC/PDPS refers to the separate Diagnosis Procedure Combination / Per-Diem Payment System. The categories and patient counts here describe source records and reporting coverage; they are not a quality rating, hospital recommendation or complete measure of care provided.
| Measure | 名古屋市 / 昭和区 | 刈谷市 |
|---|---|---|
| DPC records | 5 | 5 |
| Reported DPC patient count | 43,406 people | 16,192 people |
| Reported emergency admissions | 9,355 admissions | 4,336 admissions |
| Reported ambulance transports | 45,690 transports | 16,521 transports |
| Measure | 名古屋市 / 昭和区 | 刈谷市 |
|---|---|---|
| DPC major diagnosis category 06 | 9,832 reported cases (22.65%) | 3,648 reported cases (22.53%) |
| DPC major diagnosis category 04 | 4,704 reported cases (10.84%) | 2,588 reported cases (15.98%) |
| DPC major diagnosis category 05 | 4,439 reported cases (10.23%) | 1,523 reported cases (9.41%) |
| DPC major diagnosis category 11 | 3,761 reported cases (8.66%) | 1,684 reported cases (10.4%) |
| DPC major diagnosis category 12 | 3,013 reported cases (6.94%) | 638 reported cases (3.94%) |
| DPC major diagnosis category 01 | 2,726 reported cases (6.28%) | 1,157 reported cases (7.15%) |
| DPC major diagnosis category 02 | 2,518 reported cases (5.8%) | 509 reported cases (3.14%) |
| DPC major diagnosis category 07 | 2,306 reported cases (5.31%) | 1,031 reported cases (6.37%) |
| DPC major diagnosis category 16 | 2,156 reported cases (4.97%) | 1,154 reported cases (7.13%) |
| DPC major diagnosis category 10 | 1,730 reported cases (3.99%) | 454 reported cases (2.8%) |
| DPC major diagnosis category 03 | 1,634 reported cases (3.76%) | 715 reported cases (4.42%) |
| DPC major diagnosis category 14 | 1,222 reported cases (2.82%) | 163 reported cases (1.01%) |
| DPC major diagnosis category 13 | 1,142 reported cases (2.63%) | 158 reported cases (0.98%) |
| DPC major diagnosis category 09 | 802 reported cases (1.85%) | 154 reported cases (0.95%) |
| DPC major diagnosis category 08 | 639 reported cases (1.47%) | 283 reported cases (1.75%) |
| DPC major diagnosis category 18 | 590 reported cases (1.36%) | 245 reported cases (1.51%) |
| DPC major diagnosis category 15 | 158 reported cases (0.36%) | 88 reported cases (0.54%) |
| DPC major diagnosis category 17 | 34 reported cases (0.08%) | Not reported |
Browse another municipality. Each municipality profile provides its own source details; comparison does not create a combined score or rank.
Source titles and official records may be in Japanese. Dates and geographic units are shown separately for each source.
A missing numeric value is not converted to zero. Open a municipality profile to see its source details and geographic context.