名古屋市 / 瑞穂区
- Hospitals with 400 or more reported beds
- 16.67%
- Share of reported beds at the three largest facilities
- 88.68%
Shares use facilities and bed counts reported in this snapshot; they do not rate places.
Side-by-side comparison
Compare municipality data
Select up to three municipalities and review published measures side by side. Values retain their source periods and geographic basis; the comparison does not rank places or rate healthcare.
Comparison order
Selected municipalities
The list and columns use a stable municipality-code order. Add or replace a place, remove one or clear the selection; the selected codes stay in this page URL.
- 1名古屋市 / 瑞穂区Aichi Prefecture · 23108
- 2名古屋市 / 名東区Aichi Prefecture · 23115
- 3刈谷市Aichi Prefecture · 23210
Published measures
| Measure | 名古屋市 / 瑞穂区 Aichi Prefecture · 23108 Listed facilities | 名古屋市 / 名東区 Aichi Prefecture · 23115 Listed facilities | 刈谷市 Aichi Prefecture · 23210 Listed facilities |
|---|---|---|---|
| Listed hospitals (facilities at provider locations) | 6 | 6 | 7 |
| Reported beds (beds reported by hospitals) | 1,104 | 776 | 1,484 |
| Resident population (people) | 107,751 | 159,594 | 152,984 |
| Listed hospitals per 100,000 residents | 5.57 | 3.76 | 4.58 |
| Reported beds per 100,000 residents | 1,024.58 | 486.23 | 970.04 |
“Reported beds” are not licensed, staffed, available or occupied beds. Per-population rates combine provider-location counts with resident-population denominators; they do not measure access or capacity.
Facility profile and published bed measures
| Measure | 名古屋市 / 瑞穂区 | 名古屋市 / 名東区 | 刈谷市 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Listed hospitals (provider-location count) | 6 | 6 | 7 |
| Facilities with a reported bed count | 6 | 6 | 7 |
| Reported beds (hospital survey field) | 1,104 beds | 776 beds | 1,484 beds |
| Mean reported beds per reporting facility | 184 beds | 129.33 beds | 212 beds |
| Median reported beds per reporting facility | 69.5 beds | 79.5 beds | 155 beds |
| First quartile (Q1) of reported beds | 40.25 beds | 55.75 beds | 100 beds |
| Third quartile (Q3) of reported beds | 94.25 beds | 130.25 beds | 202.5 beds |
Bed summaries exclude records with unknown bed counts. A missing bed count is not treated as zero. These figures describe the listed facility records and do not measure capacity or access.
Distribution of listed hospitals by reported-bed band
Bands are descriptive groups of reported bed counts. They are not quality ratings or rankings.
| Measure | 名古屋市 / 瑞穂区 | 名古屋市 / 名東区 | 刈谷市 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–99 beds | 5 | 3 | 2 |
| 100–199 beds | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| 200–399 beds | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| 400+ beds | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Housing measures
Housing statistics describe the survey's municipal geography and reference period. They are not healthcare measures.
| Measure | 名古屋市 / 瑞穂区 | 名古屋市 / 名東区 | 刈谷市 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Housing units | 58,450 housing units | 83,550 housing units | 73,500 housing units |
| Vacant housing rate | 11.360137% | 12.890485% | 10.598639% |
| Owner-occupied housing rate | 53.630952% | 46.771859% | 59.652174% |
| Rented housing rate | 46.369048% | 53.228141% | 40.347826% |
| Floor area per dwelling | 80.02 m² | 79.86 m² | 93.48 m² |
| Monthly rent (includes zero-yen responses) | 59,716 JPY per month | 62,826 JPY per month | 54,730 JPY per month |
Road traffic safety records
These events are grouped by occurrence-location municipality, not by residents' place of residence or provider location. Counts do not measure individual risk or predict future events.
| Measure | 名古屋市 / 瑞穂区 | 名古屋市 / 名東区 | 刈谷市 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Road traffic accidents | 313 cases | 401 cases | 534 cases |
| Road traffic deaths | 1 people | 1 people | 2 people |
| Road traffic injuries | 373 people | 459 people | 654 people |
Older population, households and care providers
Resident population
Resident-population geography.
| Measure | 名古屋市 / 瑞穂区 | 名古屋市 / 名東区 | 刈谷市 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Population aged 65 and over | 26,996 people | 35,530 people | 31,028 people |
| Population aged 75 and over | 14,204 people | 18,390 people | 15,141 people |
| Share of population aged 65 and over | 28.03469% | 22.88066% | 20.91738% |
Resident household measures
Household geography, based on residents' place of residence.
| Measure | 名古屋市 / 瑞穂区 | 名古屋市 / 名東区 | 刈谷市 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Single-person households with a householder aged 65 and over | 6,431 households | 8,149 households | 5,279 households |
Care providers by provider location
Provider-location geography. Provider counts do not show where residents receive services or whether services are available.
| Measure | 名古屋市 / 瑞穂区 | 名古屋市 / 名東区 | 刈谷市 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Home-visit care providers | 40 service providers | 92 service providers | 33 service providers |
| Visiting nursing providers | 30 service providers | 61 service providers | 22 service providers |
| Day-care providers | 13 service providers | 17 service providers | 26 service providers |
| Care-management providers | 30 service providers | 48 service providers | 30 service providers |
| Welfare-facility providers | 5 service providers | 2 service providers | 5 service providers |
Projected population
Future values are source-produced projections, not observed future outcomes. Each row retains its stated reference year and observation status.
| Measure | 名古屋市 / 瑞穂区 | 名古屋市 / 名東区 | 刈谷市 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total population — 2020 (baseline) | 108,332 people | 164,755 people | 153,834 people |
| Population aged 65 and over — 2020 (baseline) | 29,453 people | 37,935 people | 31,748 people |
| Population aged 75 and over — 2020 (baseline) | 15,397 people | 20,266 people | 15,479 people |
| Total population — 2025 (projected) | 108,257 people | 164,364 people | 155,197 people |
| Population aged 65 and over — 2025 (projected) | 29,953 people | 39,874 people | 33,261 people |
| Population aged 75 and over — 2025 (projected) | 17,740 people | 23,871 people | 19,236 people |
| Total population — 2030 (projected) | 107,268 people | 162,756 people | 154,984 people |
| Population aged 65 and over — 2030 (projected) | 30,738 people | 42,501 people | 35,688 people |
| Population aged 75 and over — 2030 (projected) | 18,252 people | 25,236 people | 20,733 people |
| Total population — 2035 (projected) | 105,945 people | 160,979 people | 153,925 people |
| Population aged 65 and over — 2035 (projected) | 31,501 people | 45,615 people | 38,755 people |
| Population aged 75 and over — 2035 (projected) | 18,118 people | 26,007 people | 21,005 people |
| Total population — 2040 (projected) | 104,157 people | 158,638 people | 151,845 people |
| Population aged 65 and over — 2040 (projected) | 33,095 people | 48,876 people | 42,532 people |
| Population aged 75 and over — 2040 (projected) | 18,496 people | 27,610 people | 22,210 people |
| Total population — 2045 (projected) | 101,970 people | 155,548 people | 148,880 people |
| Population aged 65 and over — 2045 (projected) | 33,629 people | 49,618 people | 44,422 people |
| Population aged 75 and over — 2045 (projected) | 19,159 people | 29,730 people | 24,359 people |
| Total population — 2050 (projected) | 99,531 people | 152,101 people | 145,393 people |
| Population aged 65 and over — 2050 (projected) | 33,767 people | 49,812 people | 45,485 people |
| Population aged 75 and over — 2050 (projected) | 20,751 people | 32,459 people | 27,561 people |
Children, families and related measures
This group brings together measures with different definitions and source periods. A listed specialty or facility record is not evidence of service quality, capacity, availability or access.
This measure reports the source-published capacity as of 1 April 2025. It does not show vacancies or places currently available. Figures published only for a designated city are not allocated to its wards. Where no ward-level figure is verified, no figure is shown; this does not mean zero.
| Measure | 名古屋市 / 瑞穂区 | 名古屋市 / 名東区 | 刈谷市 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Population aged 0–14 | 12,066 people | 22,683 people | 20,887 people |
| Share of population aged 0–14 | 12.53025% | 14.60743% | 14.08087% |
| Facilities with a listed pediatrics entry | 2 facilities | 1 facilities | 1 facilities |
| Physicians whose principal specialty is pediatrics | 41 people | 12 people | 17 people |
| Facilities with a listed obstetrics and gynecology entry | 1 facilities | 0 facilities — Confirmed zero | 1 facilities |
| Published childcare enrollment capacity | Not observed | Not observed | 3,656 capacity slots |
| Households with members under 18 | 8,735 households | 16,384 households | 14,714 households |
| Measure | 名古屋市 / 瑞穂区 | 名古屋市 / 名東区 | 刈谷市 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 2020 | 13,212 people | 22,981 people | 21,307 people |
| Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 2025 | 13,009 people | 21,657 people | 19,960 people |
| Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 2030 | 12,435 people | 20,311 people | 18,405 people |
| Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 2035 | 12,026 people | 19,960 people | 17,915 people |
| Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 2040 | 11,932 people | 19,894 people | 17,696 people |
| Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 2045 | 11,683 people | 19,503 people | 17,229 people |
| Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 2050 | 11,175 people | 18,636 people | 16,330 people |
Diagnosis Procedure Combination (DPC) records
DPC is the Diagnosis Procedure Combination diagnosis-group classification used in these records. DPC/PDPS refers to the separate Diagnosis Procedure Combination / Per-Diem Payment System. The categories and patient counts here describe source records and reporting coverage; they are not a quality rating, hospital recommendation or complete measure of care provided.
| Measure | 名古屋市 / 瑞穂区 | 名古屋市 / 名東区 | 刈谷市 |
|---|---|---|---|
| DPC records | 4 | 6 | 5 |
| Reported DPC patient count | 17,987 people | 681 people | 16,192 people |
| Reported emergency admissions | 2,212 admissions | 60 admissions | 4,336 admissions |
| Reported ambulance transports | 19,080 transports | 711 transports | 16,521 transports |
| Measure | 名古屋市 / 瑞穂区 | 名古屋市 / 名東区 | 刈谷市 |
|---|---|---|---|
| DPC major diagnosis category 06 | 4,862 reported cases (27.03%) | 18 reported cases (2.64%) | 3,648 reported cases (22.53%) |
| DPC major diagnosis category 04 | 1,729 reported cases (9.61%) | 240 reported cases (35.24%) | 2,588 reported cases (15.98%) |
| DPC major diagnosis category 11 | 1,720 reported cases (9.56%) | 19 reported cases (2.79%) | 1,684 reported cases (10.4%) |
| DPC major diagnosis category 01 | 1,242 reported cases (6.9%) | 123 reported cases (18.06%) | 1,157 reported cases (7.15%) |
| DPC major diagnosis category 05 | 1,227 reported cases (6.82%) | 28 reported cases (4.11%) | 1,523 reported cases (9.41%) |
| DPC major diagnosis category 07 | 1,099 reported cases (6.11%) | 45 reported cases (6.61%) | 1,031 reported cases (6.37%) |
| DPC major diagnosis category 03 | 1,055 reported cases (5.87%) | 82 reported cases (12.04%) | 715 reported cases (4.42%) |
| DPC major diagnosis category 02 | 854 reported cases (4.75%) | Not reported | 509 reported cases (3.14%) |
| DPC major diagnosis category 12 | 782 reported cases (4.35%) | Not reported | 638 reported cases (3.94%) |
| DPC major diagnosis category 16 | 669 reported cases (3.72%) | 91 reported cases (13.36%) | 1,154 reported cases (7.13%) |
| DPC major diagnosis category 08 | 607 reported cases (3.37%) | 13 reported cases (1.91%) | 283 reported cases (1.75%) |
| DPC major diagnosis category 13 | 597 reported cases (3.32%) | Not reported | 158 reported cases (0.98%) |
| DPC major diagnosis category 10 | 460 reported cases (2.56%) | 22 reported cases (3.23%) | 454 reported cases (2.8%) |
| DPC major diagnosis category 14 | 431 reported cases (2.4%) | Not reported | 163 reported cases (1.01%) |
| DPC major diagnosis category 09 | 369 reported cases (2.05%) | Not reported | 154 reported cases (0.95%) |
| DPC major diagnosis category 18 | 252 reported cases (1.4%) | Not reported | 245 reported cases (1.51%) |
| DPC major diagnosis category 15 | 32 reported cases (0.18%) | Not reported | 88 reported cases (0.54%) |
Browse another municipality. Each municipality profile provides its own source details; comparison does not create a combined score or rank.
- Values are descriptive statistics based on the same published facility snapshot.
- Facilities with unknown bed counts are excluded from bed mean, median and distribution summaries; missing bed counts are not treated as zero.
- Numeric differences describe facility composition. They do not indicate healthcare quality, capacity, access, need, adequacy, superiority or rank.
- Population-denominated measures use the Basic Resident Register reference date as descriptive context; they do not measure need, access, quality, adequacy or superiority.
- When a municipality has a zero population denominator, rates per 100,000 residents are not displayed, to avoid division by zero.
Sources and reference periods
Hospital facility data
- Source agency or portal
- Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW)
- Reference period
- 1 June 2026
- Retrieved
- 22 August 2026 at 03:30:08 UTC
Municipality directory
- Source agency or portal
- Government Statistics Portal (e-Stat) / Statistics Bureau of Japan
- Reference period
- 1 June 2026
- Retrieved
- 24 August 2026 at 02:13:46 UTC
Resident population
- Source agency or portal
- Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications / Government Statistics Portal (e-Stat)
- Reference period
- 2025
- Retrieved
- 24 August 2026 at 04:43:28 UTC
Diagnosis Procedure Combination (DPC) records
- Source agency or portal
- Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW)
- Reference period
- 2024-06-01/2025-05-31
- Retrieved
- 24 August 2026 at 18:37:32 UTC
Secondary medical area mapping
- Source agency or portal
- Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare / Government Statistics Portal (e-Stat)
- Reference period
- 1 October 2024
- Retrieved
- 24 August 2026 at 21:55:08 UTC
Source titles and official records may be in Japanese. Dates and geographic units are shown separately for each source.
A missing numeric value is not converted to zero. Open a municipality profile to see its source details and geographic context.