名古屋市 / 瑞穂区
- Hospitals with 400 or more reported beds
- 16.67%
- Share of reported beds at the three largest facilities
- 88.68%
Shares use facilities and bed counts reported in this snapshot; they do not rate places.
Side-by-side comparison
Select up to three municipalities and review published measures side by side. Values retain their source periods and geographic basis; the comparison does not rank places or rate healthcare.
The list and columns use a stable municipality-code order. Add or replace a place, remove one or clear the selection; the selected codes stay in this page URL.
| Measure | 名古屋市 / 瑞穂区 Aichi Prefecture · 23108 Listed facilities | 名古屋市 / 天白区 Aichi Prefecture · 23116 Listed facilities |
|---|---|---|
| Listed hospitals (facilities at provider locations) | 6 | 4 |
| Reported beds (beds reported by hospitals) | 1,104 | 1,257 |
| Resident population (people) | 107,751 | 156,525 |
| Listed hospitals per 100,000 residents | 5.57 | 2.56 |
| Reported beds per 100,000 residents | 1,024.58 | 803.07 |
“Reported beds” are not licensed, staffed, available or occupied beds. Per-population rates combine provider-location counts with resident-population denominators; they do not measure access or capacity.
| Measure | 名古屋市 / 瑞穂区 | 名古屋市 / 天白区 |
|---|---|---|
| Listed hospitals (provider-location count) | 6 | 4 |
| Facilities with a reported bed count | 6 | 4 |
| Reported beds (hospital survey field) | 1,104 beds | 1,257 beds |
| Mean reported beds per reporting facility | 184 beds | 314.25 beds |
| Median reported beds per reporting facility | 69.5 beds | 314 beds |
| First quartile (Q1) of reported beds | 40.25 beds | 195 beds |
| Third quartile (Q3) of reported beds | 94.25 beds | 433.25 beds |
Bed summaries exclude records with unknown bed counts. A missing bed count is not treated as zero. These figures describe the listed facility records and do not measure capacity or access.
Bands are descriptive groups of reported bed counts. They are not quality ratings or rankings.
| Measure | 名古屋市 / 瑞穂区 | 名古屋市 / 天白区 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–99 beds | 5 | 0 |
| 100–199 beds | 0 | 1 |
| 200–399 beds | 0 | 1 |
| 400+ beds | 1 | 2 |
These are descriptive numerical differences based on this comparison. They do not imply that either place is better, worse, adequately served or underserved.
Housing statistics describe the survey's municipal geography and reference period. They are not healthcare measures.
| Measure | 名古屋市 / 瑞穂区 | 名古屋市 / 天白区 |
|---|---|---|
| Housing units | 58,450 housing units | 90,410 housing units |
| Vacant housing rate | 11.360137% | 11.934521% |
| Owner-occupied housing rate | 53.630952% | 50.441059% |
| Rented housing rate | 46.369048% | 49.558941% |
| Floor area per dwelling | 80.02 m² | 75.6 m² |
| Monthly rent (includes zero-yen responses) | 59,716 JPY per month | 55,642 JPY per month |
These events are grouped by occurrence-location municipality, not by residents' place of residence or provider location. Counts do not measure individual risk or predict future events.
| Measure | 名古屋市 / 瑞穂区 | 名古屋市 / 天白区 |
|---|---|---|
| Road traffic accidents | 313 cases | 508 cases |
| Road traffic deaths | 1 people | 1 people |
| Road traffic injuries | 373 people | 574 people |
Resident-population geography.
| Measure | 名古屋市 / 瑞穂区 | 名古屋市 / 天白区 |
|---|---|---|
| Population aged 65 and over | 26,996 people | 36,766 people |
| Population aged 75 and over | 14,204 people | 19,501 people |
| Share of population aged 65 and over | 28.03469% | 23.24461% |
Household geography, based on residents' place of residence.
| Measure | 名古屋市 / 瑞穂区 | 名古屋市 / 天白区 |
|---|---|---|
| Single-person households with a householder aged 65 and over | 6,431 households | 7,874 households |
Provider-location geography. Provider counts do not show where residents receive services or whether services are available.
| Measure | 名古屋市 / 瑞穂区 | 名古屋市 / 天白区 |
|---|---|---|
| Home-visit care providers | 40 service providers | 79 service providers |
| Visiting nursing providers | 30 service providers | 50 service providers |
| Day-care providers | 13 service providers | 24 service providers |
| Care-management providers | 30 service providers | 48 service providers |
| Welfare-facility providers | 5 service providers | 8 service providers |
Future values are source-produced projections, not observed future outcomes. Each row retains its stated reference year and observation status.
| Measure | 名古屋市 / 瑞穂区 | 名古屋市 / 天白区 |
|---|---|---|
| Total population — 2020 (baseline) | 108,332 people | 164,817 people |
| Population aged 65 and over — 2020 (baseline) | 29,453 people | 38,336 people |
| Population aged 75 and over — 2020 (baseline) | 15,397 people | 20,381 people |
| Total population — 2025 (projected) | 108,257 people | 159,714 people |
| Population aged 65 and over — 2025 (projected) | 29,953 people | 40,379 people |
| Population aged 75 and over — 2025 (projected) | 17,740 people | 23,747 people |
| Total population — 2030 (projected) | 107,268 people | 158,783 people |
| Population aged 65 and over — 2030 (projected) | 30,738 people | 43,576 people |
| Population aged 75 and over — 2030 (projected) | 18,252 people | 25,053 people |
| Total population — 2035 (projected) | 105,945 people | 157,352 people |
| Population aged 65 and over — 2035 (projected) | 31,501 people | 47,316 people |
| Population aged 75 and over — 2035 (projected) | 18,118 people | 26,055 people |
| Total population — 2040 (projected) | 104,157 people | 155,377 people |
| Population aged 65 and over — 2040 (projected) | 33,095 people | 51,207 people |
| Population aged 75 and over — 2040 (projected) | 18,496 people | 28,034 people |
| Total population — 2045 (projected) | 101,970 people | 152,705 people |
| Population aged 65 and over — 2045 (projected) | 33,629 people | 52,309 people |
| Population aged 75 and over — 2045 (projected) | 19,159 people | 30,816 people |
| Total population — 2050 (projected) | 99,531 people | 149,490 people |
| Population aged 65 and over — 2050 (projected) | 33,767 people | 52,563 people |
| Population aged 75 and over — 2050 (projected) | 20,751 people | 34,038 people |
This group brings together measures with different definitions and source periods. A listed specialty or facility record is not evidence of service quality, capacity, availability or access.
This measure reports the source-published capacity as of 1 April 2025. It does not show vacancies or places currently available. Figures published only for a designated city are not allocated to its wards. Where no ward-level figure is verified, no figure is shown; this does not mean zero.
| Measure | 名古屋市 / 瑞穂区 | 名古屋市 / 天白区 |
|---|---|---|
| Population aged 0–14 | 12,066 people | 20,347 people |
| Share of population aged 0–14 | 12.53025% | 12.86401% |
| Facilities with a listed pediatrics entry | 2 facilities | 1 facilities |
| Physicians whose principal specialty is pediatrics | 41 people | 19 people |
| Facilities with a listed obstetrics and gynecology entry | 1 facilities | 0 facilities — Confirmed zero |
| Published childcare enrollment capacity | Not observed | Not observed |
| Households with members under 18 | 8,735 households | 14,947 households |
| Measure | 名古屋市 / 瑞穂区 | 名古屋市 / 天白区 |
|---|---|---|
| Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 2020 | 13,212 people | 20,349 people |
| Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 2025 | 13,009 people | 18,785 people |
| Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 2030 | 12,435 people | 17,580 people |
| Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 2035 | 12,026 people | 17,077 people |
| Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 2040 | 11,932 people | 16,990 people |
| Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 2045 | 11,683 people | 16,614 people |
| Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 2050 | 11,175 people | 15,839 people |
DPC is the Diagnosis Procedure Combination diagnosis-group classification used in these records. DPC/PDPS refers to the separate Diagnosis Procedure Combination / Per-Diem Payment System. The categories and patient counts here describe source records and reporting coverage; they are not a quality rating, hospital recommendation or complete measure of care provided.
| Measure | 名古屋市 / 瑞穂区 | 名古屋市 / 天白区 |
|---|---|---|
| DPC records | 4 | 4 |
| Reported DPC patient count | 17,987 people | 7,740 people |
| Reported emergency admissions | 2,212 admissions | 3,399 admissions |
| Reported ambulance transports | 19,080 transports | 8,142 transports |
| Measure | 名古屋市 / 瑞穂区 | 名古屋市 / 天白区 |
|---|---|---|
| DPC major diagnosis category 06 | 4,862 reported cases (27.03%) | 1,533 reported cases (19.81%) |
| DPC major diagnosis category 04 | 1,729 reported cases (9.61%) | 1,376 reported cases (17.78%) |
| DPC major diagnosis category 11 | 1,720 reported cases (9.56%) | 830 reported cases (10.72%) |
| DPC major diagnosis category 01 | 1,242 reported cases (6.9%) | 157 reported cases (2.03%) |
| DPC major diagnosis category 05 | 1,227 reported cases (6.82%) | 667 reported cases (8.62%) |
| DPC major diagnosis category 07 | 1,099 reported cases (6.11%) | 224 reported cases (2.89%) |
| DPC major diagnosis category 03 | 1,055 reported cases (5.87%) | 227 reported cases (2.93%) |
| DPC major diagnosis category 02 | 854 reported cases (4.75%) | 16 reported cases (0.21%) |
| DPC major diagnosis category 12 | 782 reported cases (4.35%) | 271 reported cases (3.5%) |
| DPC major diagnosis category 16 | 669 reported cases (3.72%) | 965 reported cases (12.47%) |
| DPC major diagnosis category 08 | 607 reported cases (3.37%) | 77 reported cases (0.99%) |
| DPC major diagnosis category 13 | 597 reported cases (3.32%) | 327 reported cases (4.22%) |
| DPC major diagnosis category 10 | 460 reported cases (2.56%) | 635 reported cases (8.2%) |
| DPC major diagnosis category 14 | 431 reported cases (2.4%) | 70 reported cases (0.9%) |
| DPC major diagnosis category 09 | 369 reported cases (2.05%) | 20 reported cases (0.26%) |
| DPC major diagnosis category 18 | 252 reported cases (1.4%) | 279 reported cases (3.6%) |
| DPC major diagnosis category 15 | 32 reported cases (0.18%) | 56 reported cases (0.72%) |
| DPC major diagnosis category 17 | Not reported | 10 reported cases (0.13%) |
Browse another municipality. Each municipality profile provides its own source details; comparison does not create a combined score or rank.
Source titles and official records may be in Japanese. Dates and geographic units are shown separately for each source.
A missing numeric value is not converted to zero. Open a municipality profile to see its source details and geographic context.