Side-by-side comparison

Compare municipality data

Select up to three municipalities and review published measures side by side. Values retain their source periods and geographic basis; the comparison does not rank places or rate healthcare.

Japanese place names are retained when no verified English name is available.

Comparison order

Selected municipalities

2 / 3 selected

The list and columns use a stable municipality-code order. Add or replace a place, remove one or clear the selection; the selected codes stay in this page URL.

  1. 1
    名古屋市 / 瑞穂区Aichi Prefecture · 23108
  2. 2
    東海市Aichi Prefecture · 23222

Published measures

Descriptive values from their stated sources; periods may differ between measures.
Measure名古屋市 / 瑞穂区
Aichi Prefecture · 23108
Listed facilities
東海市
Aichi Prefecture · 23222
Listed facilities
Listed hospitals (facilities at provider locations)62
Reported beds (beds reported by hospitals)1,104708
Resident population (people)107,751113,352
Listed hospitals per 100,000 residents5.571.76
Reported beds per 100,000 residents1,024.58624.6

“Reported beds” are not licensed, staffed, available or occupied beds. Per-population rates combine provider-location counts with resident-population denominators; they do not measure access or capacity.

Facility profile and published bed measures

Measure名古屋市 / 瑞穂区東海市
Listed hospitals (provider-location count)62
Facilities with a reported bed count62
Reported beds (hospital survey field)1,104 beds708 beds
Mean reported beds per reporting facility184 beds354 beds
Median reported beds per reporting facility69.5 beds354 beds
First quartile (Q1) of reported beds40.25 beds297 beds
Third quartile (Q3) of reported beds94.25 beds411 beds

Bed summaries exclude records with unknown bed counts. A missing bed count is not treated as zero. These figures describe the listed facility records and do not measure capacity or access.

Distribution of listed hospitals by reported-bed band

Bands are descriptive groups of reported bed counts. They are not quality ratings or rankings.

Measure名古屋市 / 瑞穂区東海市
0–99 beds50
100–199 beds00
200–399 beds01
400+ beds11

名古屋市 / 瑞穂区

Hospitals with 400 or more reported beds
16.67%
Share of reported beds at the three largest facilities
88.68%

Shares use facilities and bed counts reported in this snapshot; they do not rate places.

東海市

Hospitals with 400 or more reported beds
50%
Share of reported beds at the three largest facilities
Value not returned

Shares use facilities and bed counts reported in this snapshot; they do not rate places.

Differences in the selected measures

These are descriptive numerical differences based on this comparison. They do not imply that either place is better, worse, adequately served or underserved.

  • Listed hospitals per 100,000 residents: 5.57 vs 1.76; absolute difference 3.81. Denominator: Resident population from the shared population release. Source periods: 1 June 2026 / 2025.
  • Reported beds per 100,000 residents: 1,024.58 vs 624.6; absolute difference 399.98. Denominator: Resident population from the shared population release. Source periods: 1 June 2026 / 2025.

Housing measures

Housing statistics describe the survey's municipal geography and reference period. They are not healthcare measures.

Measure名古屋市 / 瑞穂区東海市
Housing units58,450 housing units53,900 housing units
Vacant housing rate11.360137%12.820037%
Owner-occupied housing rate53.630952%61.983654%
Rented housing rate46.369048%38.016346%
Floor area per dwelling80.02 m²90.52 m²
Monthly rent (includes zero-yen responses)59,716 JPY per month53,206 JPY per month

Road traffic safety records

These events are grouped by occurrence-location municipality, not by residents' place of residence or provider location. Counts do not measure individual risk or predict future events.

Measure名古屋市 / 瑞穂区東海市
Road traffic accidents313 cases302 cases
Road traffic deaths1 people4 people
Road traffic injuries373 people363 people

Older population, households and care providers

Resident population

Resident-population geography.

Measure名古屋市 / 瑞穂区東海市
Population aged 65 and over26,996 people25,005 people
Population aged 75 and over14,204 people12,947 people
Share of population aged 65 and over28.03469%22.47297%

Resident household measures

Household geography, based on residents' place of residence.

Measure名古屋市 / 瑞穂区東海市
Single-person households with a householder aged 65 and over6,431 households4,468 households

Care providers by provider location

Provider-location geography. Provider counts do not show where residents receive services or whether services are available.

Measure名古屋市 / 瑞穂区東海市
Home-visit care providers40 service providers18 service providers
Visiting nursing providers30 service providers17 service providers
Day-care providers13 service providers21 service providers
Care-management providers30 service providers16 service providers
Welfare-facility providers5 service providers5 service providers

Projected population

Future values are source-produced projections, not observed future outcomes. Each row retains its stated reference year and observation status.

Measure名古屋市 / 瑞穂区東海市
Total population — 2020 (baseline)108,332 people113,787 people
Population aged 65 and over — 2020 (baseline)29,453 people25,693 people
Population aged 75 and over — 2020 (baseline)15,397 people13,358 people
Total population — 2025 (projected)108,257 people114,369 people
Population aged 65 and over — 2025 (projected)29,953 people26,116 people
Population aged 75 and over — 2025 (projected)17,740 people15,603 people
Total population — 2030 (projected)107,268 people113,702 people
Population aged 65 and over — 2030 (projected)30,738 people26,565 people
Population aged 75 and over — 2030 (projected)18,252 people15,919 people
Total population — 2035 (projected)105,945 people112,509 people
Population aged 65 and over — 2035 (projected)31,501 people27,797 people
Population aged 75 and over — 2035 (projected)18,118 people15,499 people
Total population — 2040 (projected)104,157 people110,891 people
Population aged 65 and over — 2040 (projected)33,095 people30,276 people
Population aged 75 and over — 2040 (projected)18,496 people15,590 people
Total population — 2045 (projected)101,970 people108,945 people
Population aged 65 and over — 2045 (projected)33,629 people31,531 people
Population aged 75 and over — 2045 (projected)19,159 people16,702 people
Total population — 2050 (projected)99,531 people106,739 people
Population aged 65 and over — 2050 (projected)33,767 people32,160 people
Population aged 75 and over — 2050 (projected)20,751 people19,065 people

Children, families and related measures

This group brings together measures with different definitions and source periods. A listed specialty or facility record is not evidence of service quality, capacity, availability or access.

This measure reports the source-published capacity as of 1 April 2025. It does not show vacancies or places currently available. Figures published only for a designated city are not allocated to its wards. Where no ward-level figure is verified, no figure is shown; this does not mean zero.

Measure名古屋市 / 瑞穂区東海市
Population aged 0–1412,066 people16,453 people
Share of population aged 0–1412.53025%14.78695%
Facilities with a listed pediatrics entry2 facilities2 facilities
Physicians whose principal specialty is pediatrics41 people11 people
Facilities with a listed obstetrics and gynecology entry1 facilities1 facilities
Published childcare enrollment capacityNot observed3,583 capacity slots
Households with members under 188,735 households11,427 households
Measure名古屋市 / 瑞穂区東海市
Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 202013,212 people16,558 people
Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 202513,009 people15,252 people
Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 203012,435 people14,223 people
Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 203512,026 people13,901 people
Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 204011,932 people13,856 people
Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 204511,683 people13,560 people
Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 205011,175 people12,932 people

Browse another municipality. Each municipality profile provides its own source details; comparison does not create a combined score or rank.

  • Values are descriptive statistics based on the same published facility snapshot.
  • Facilities with unknown bed counts are excluded from bed mean, median and distribution summaries; missing bed counts are not treated as zero.
  • Numeric differences describe facility composition. They do not indicate healthcare quality, capacity, access, need, adequacy, superiority or rank.
  • Population-denominated measures use the Basic Resident Register reference date as descriptive context; they do not measure need, access, quality, adequacy or superiority.
  • When a municipality has a zero population denominator, rates per 100,000 residents are not displayed, to avoid division by zero.

Sources and reference periods

Source titles and official records may be in Japanese. Dates and geographic units are shown separately for each source.

A missing numeric value is not converted to zero. Open a municipality profile to see its source details and geographic context.