刈谷市
- Hospitals with 400 or more reported beds
- 14.29%
- Share of reported beds at the three largest facilities
- 74.73%
Shares use facilities and bed counts reported in this snapshot; they do not rate places.
Side-by-side comparison
Select up to three municipalities and review published measures side by side. Values retain their source periods and geographic basis; the comparison does not rank places or rate healthcare.
The list and columns use a stable municipality-code order. Add or replace a place, remove one or clear the selection; the selected codes stay in this page URL.
| Measure | 刈谷市 Aichi Prefecture · 23210 Listed facilities | 東海市 Aichi Prefecture · 23222 Listed facilities |
|---|---|---|
| Listed hospitals (facilities at provider locations) | 7 | 2 |
| Reported beds (beds reported by hospitals) | 1,484 | 708 |
| Resident population (people) | 152,984 | 113,352 |
| Listed hospitals per 100,000 residents | 4.58 | 1.76 |
| Reported beds per 100,000 residents | 970.04 | 624.6 |
“Reported beds” are not licensed, staffed, available or occupied beds. Per-population rates combine provider-location counts with resident-population denominators; they do not measure access or capacity.
| Measure | 刈谷市 | 東海市 |
|---|---|---|
| Listed hospitals (provider-location count) | 7 | 2 |
| Facilities with a reported bed count | 7 | 2 |
| Reported beds (hospital survey field) | 1,484 beds | 708 beds |
| Mean reported beds per reporting facility | 212 beds | 354 beds |
| Median reported beds per reporting facility | 155 beds | 354 beds |
| First quartile (Q1) of reported beds | 100 beds | 297 beds |
| Third quartile (Q3) of reported beds | 202.5 beds | 411 beds |
Bed summaries exclude records with unknown bed counts. A missing bed count is not treated as zero. These figures describe the listed facility records and do not measure capacity or access.
Bands are descriptive groups of reported bed counts. They are not quality ratings or rankings.
| Measure | 刈谷市 | 東海市 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–99 beds | 2 | 0 |
| 100–199 beds | 3 | 0 |
| 200–399 beds | 1 | 1 |
| 400+ beds | 1 | 1 |
These are descriptive numerical differences based on this comparison. They do not imply that either place is better, worse, adequately served or underserved.
Housing statistics describe the survey's municipal geography and reference period. They are not healthcare measures.
| Measure | 刈谷市 | 東海市 |
|---|---|---|
| Housing units | 73,500 housing units | 53,900 housing units |
| Vacant housing rate | 10.598639% | 12.820037% |
| Owner-occupied housing rate | 59.652174% | 61.983654% |
| Rented housing rate | 40.347826% | 38.016346% |
| Floor area per dwelling | 93.48 m² | 90.52 m² |
| Monthly rent (includes zero-yen responses) | 54,730 JPY per month | 53,206 JPY per month |
These events are grouped by occurrence-location municipality, not by residents' place of residence or provider location. Counts do not measure individual risk or predict future events.
| Measure | 刈谷市 | 東海市 |
|---|---|---|
| Road traffic accidents | 534 cases | 302 cases |
| Road traffic deaths | 2 people | 4 people |
| Road traffic injuries | 654 people | 363 people |
Resident-population geography.
| Measure | 刈谷市 | 東海市 |
|---|---|---|
| Population aged 65 and over | 31,028 people | 25,005 people |
| Population aged 75 and over | 15,141 people | 12,947 people |
| Share of population aged 65 and over | 20.91738% | 22.47297% |
Household geography, based on residents' place of residence.
| Measure | 刈谷市 | 東海市 |
|---|---|---|
| Single-person households with a householder aged 65 and over | 5,279 households | 4,468 households |
Provider-location geography. Provider counts do not show where residents receive services or whether services are available.
| Measure | 刈谷市 | 東海市 |
|---|---|---|
| Home-visit care providers | 33 service providers | 18 service providers |
| Visiting nursing providers | 22 service providers | 17 service providers |
| Day-care providers | 26 service providers | 21 service providers |
| Care-management providers | 30 service providers | 16 service providers |
| Welfare-facility providers | 5 service providers | 5 service providers |
Future values are source-produced projections, not observed future outcomes. Each row retains its stated reference year and observation status.
| Measure | 刈谷市 | 東海市 |
|---|---|---|
| Total population — 2020 (baseline) | 153,834 people | 113,787 people |
| Population aged 65 and over — 2020 (baseline) | 31,748 people | 25,693 people |
| Population aged 75 and over — 2020 (baseline) | 15,479 people | 13,358 people |
| Total population — 2025 (projected) | 155,197 people | 114,369 people |
| Population aged 65 and over — 2025 (projected) | 33,261 people | 26,116 people |
| Population aged 75 and over — 2025 (projected) | 19,236 people | 15,603 people |
| Total population — 2030 (projected) | 154,984 people | 113,702 people |
| Population aged 65 and over — 2030 (projected) | 35,688 people | 26,565 people |
| Population aged 75 and over — 2030 (projected) | 20,733 people | 15,919 people |
| Total population — 2035 (projected) | 153,925 people | 112,509 people |
| Population aged 65 and over — 2035 (projected) | 38,755 people | 27,797 people |
| Population aged 75 and over — 2035 (projected) | 21,005 people | 15,499 people |
| Total population — 2040 (projected) | 151,845 people | 110,891 people |
| Population aged 65 and over — 2040 (projected) | 42,532 people | 30,276 people |
| Population aged 75 and over — 2040 (projected) | 22,210 people | 15,590 people |
| Total population — 2045 (projected) | 148,880 people | 108,945 people |
| Population aged 65 and over — 2045 (projected) | 44,422 people | 31,531 people |
| Population aged 75 and over — 2045 (projected) | 24,359 people | 16,702 people |
| Total population — 2050 (projected) | 145,393 people | 106,739 people |
| Population aged 65 and over — 2050 (projected) | 45,485 people | 32,160 people |
| Population aged 75 and over — 2050 (projected) | 27,561 people | 19,065 people |
This group brings together measures with different definitions and source periods. A listed specialty or facility record is not evidence of service quality, capacity, availability or access.
This measure reports the source-published capacity as of 1 April 2025. It does not show vacancies or places currently available. Figures published only for a designated city are not allocated to its wards. Where no ward-level figure is verified, no figure is shown; this does not mean zero.
| Measure | 刈谷市 | 東海市 |
|---|---|---|
| Population aged 0–14 | 20,887 people | 16,453 people |
| Share of population aged 0–14 | 14.08087% | 14.78695% |
| Facilities with a listed pediatrics entry | 1 facilities | 2 facilities |
| Physicians whose principal specialty is pediatrics | 17 people | 11 people |
| Facilities with a listed obstetrics and gynecology entry | 1 facilities | 1 facilities |
| Published childcare enrollment capacity | 3,656 capacity slots | 3,583 capacity slots |
| Households with members under 18 | 14,714 households | 11,427 households |
| Measure | 刈谷市 | 東海市 |
|---|---|---|
| Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 2020 | 21,307 people | 16,558 people |
| Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 2025 | 19,960 people | 15,252 people |
| Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 2030 | 18,405 people | 14,223 people |
| Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 2035 | 17,915 people | 13,901 people |
| Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 2040 | 17,696 people | 13,856 people |
| Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 2045 | 17,229 people | 13,560 people |
| Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 2050 | 16,330 people | 12,932 people |
DPC is the Diagnosis Procedure Combination diagnosis-group classification used in these records. DPC/PDPS refers to the separate Diagnosis Procedure Combination / Per-Diem Payment System. The categories and patient counts here describe source records and reporting coverage; they are not a quality rating, hospital recommendation or complete measure of care provided.
| Measure | 刈谷市 | 東海市 |
|---|---|---|
| DPC records | 5 | 3 |
| Reported DPC patient count | 16,192 people | 8,762 people |
| Reported emergency admissions | 4,336 admissions | 4,027 admissions |
| Reported ambulance transports | 16,521 transports | 9,178 transports |
| Measure | 刈谷市 | 東海市 |
|---|---|---|
| DPC major diagnosis category 06 | 3,648 reported cases (22.53%) | 1,958 reported cases (22.35%) |
| DPC major diagnosis category 04 | 2,588 reported cases (15.98%) | 1,305 reported cases (14.89%) |
| DPC major diagnosis category 11 | 1,684 reported cases (10.4%) | 818 reported cases (9.34%) |
| DPC major diagnosis category 05 | 1,523 reported cases (9.41%) | 748 reported cases (8.54%) |
| DPC major diagnosis category 01 | 1,157 reported cases (7.15%) | 628 reported cases (7.17%) |
| DPC major diagnosis category 16 | 1,154 reported cases (7.13%) | 922 reported cases (10.52%) |
| DPC major diagnosis category 07 | 1,031 reported cases (6.37%) | 291 reported cases (3.32%) |
| DPC major diagnosis category 03 | 715 reported cases (4.42%) | 392 reported cases (4.47%) |
| DPC major diagnosis category 12 | 638 reported cases (3.94%) | 214 reported cases (2.44%) |
| DPC major diagnosis category 02 | 509 reported cases (3.14%) | 492 reported cases (5.62%) |
| DPC major diagnosis category 10 | 454 reported cases (2.8%) | 327 reported cases (3.73%) |
| DPC major diagnosis category 08 | 283 reported cases (1.75%) | 230 reported cases (2.62%) |
| DPC major diagnosis category 18 | 245 reported cases (1.51%) | 165 reported cases (1.88%) |
| DPC major diagnosis category 14 | 163 reported cases (1.01%) | 13 reported cases (0.15%) |
| DPC major diagnosis category 13 | 158 reported cases (0.98%) | 103 reported cases (1.18%) |
| DPC major diagnosis category 09 | 154 reported cases (0.95%) | 134 reported cases (1.53%) |
| DPC major diagnosis category 15 | 88 reported cases (0.54%) | 22 reported cases (0.25%) |
Browse another municipality. Each municipality profile provides its own source details; comparison does not create a combined score or rank.
Source titles and official records may be in Japanese. Dates and geographic units are shown separately for each source.
A missing numeric value is not converted to zero. Open a municipality profile to see its source details and geographic context.