Side-by-side comparison

Compare municipality data

Select up to three municipalities and review published measures side by side. Values retain their source periods and geographic basis; the comparison does not rank places or rate healthcare.

Japanese place names are retained when no verified English name is available.

Selected places

  • 嬉野市 · Saga Prefecture — In comparison scope Open profile
  • 名寄市 · Hokkaido — In comparison scope Open profile

Published measures

Descriptive values from their stated sources; periods may differ between measures.
Measure名寄市嬉野市
Listed hospitals (facilities at provider locations)44
Reported beds (beds reported by hospitals)6681,238
Resident population (people)24,74224,446
Listed hospitals per 100,000 residents16.1716.36
Reported beds per 100,000 residents2,699.865,064.22

“Reported beds” are not licensed, staffed, available or occupied beds. Per-population rates combine provider-location counts with resident-population denominators; they do not measure access or capacity.

Facility profile and published bed measures

Measure名寄市嬉野市
Listed hospitals (provider-location count)44
Facilities with a reported bed count44
Reported beds (hospital survey field)668 beds1,238 beds
Mean reported beds per reporting facility167 beds309.5 beds
Median reported beds per reporting facility114.5 beds239.5 beds
First quartile (Q1) of reported beds101.25 beds78 beds
Third quartile (Q3) of reported beds180.25 beds471 beds

Bed summaries exclude records with unknown bed counts. A missing bed count is not treated as zero. These figures describe the listed facility records and do not measure capacity or access.

Distribution of listed hospitals by reported-bed band

Bands are descriptive groups of reported bed counts. They are not quality ratings or rankings.

Measure名寄市嬉野市
0–99 beds12
100–199 beds20
200–399 beds11
400+ beds01

名寄市

Hospitals with 400 or more reported beds
0%
Share of reported beds at the three largest facilities
86.53%

Shares use facilities and bed counts reported in this snapshot; they do not rate places.

嬉野市

Hospitals with 400 or more reported beds
25%
Share of reported beds at the three largest facilities
94.18%

Shares use facilities and bed counts reported in this snapshot; they do not rate places.

Differences in the selected measures

These are descriptive numerical differences based on this comparison. They do not imply that either place is better, worse, adequately served or underserved.

  • Reported beds per 100,000 residents: 2,699.86 vs 5,064.22; absolute difference 2,364.36. Denominator: Resident population from the shared population release. Source periods: 1 June 2026 / 2025.
  • Listed hospitals per 100,000 residents: 16.17 vs 16.36; absolute difference 0.19. Denominator: Resident population from the shared population release. Source periods: 1 June 2026 / 2025.

Housing measures

Housing statistics describe the survey's municipal geography and reference period. They are not healthcare measures.

Measure名寄市嬉野市
Housing units14,330 housing units10,740 housing units
Vacant housing rate16.468946%14.43203%
Owner-occupied housing rate62.249346%76.629213%
Rented housing rate37.750654%23.370787%
Floor area per dwelling97.34 m²133.5 m²
Monthly rent (includes zero-yen responses)41,875 JPY per month41,531 JPY per month

Road traffic safety records

These events are grouped by occurrence-location municipality, not by residents' place of residence or provider location. Counts do not measure individual risk or predict future events.

Measure名寄市嬉野市
Road traffic accidents21 cases48 cases
Road traffic deaths0 people — Confirmed zero2 people
Road traffic injuries27 people56 people

Older population, households and care providers

Resident population

Resident-population geography.

Measure名寄市嬉野市
Population aged 65 and over8,747 people9,219 people
Population aged 75 and over4,754 people4,868 people
Share of population aged 65 and over32.3999%35.76305%

Resident household measures

Household geography, based on residents' place of residence.

Measure名寄市嬉野市
Single-person households with a householder aged 65 and over1,822 households1,230 households

Care providers by provider location

Provider-location geography. Provider counts do not show where residents receive services or whether services are available.

Measure名寄市嬉野市
Home-visit care providers4 service providers6 service providers
Visiting nursing providers3 service providers2 service providers
Day-care providers4 service providers14 service providers
Care-management providers4 service providers5 service providers
Welfare-facility providers2 service providers3 service providers

Projected population

Future values are source-produced projections, not observed future outcomes. Each row retains its stated reference year and observation status.

Measure名寄市嬉野市
Total population — 2020 (baseline)27,282 people25,848 people
Population aged 65 and over — 2020 (baseline)8,780 people9,229 people
Population aged 75 and over — 2020 (baseline)4,766 people4,869 people
Total population — 2025 (projected)25,202 people24,225 people
Population aged 65 and over — 2025 (projected)8,466 people9,290 people
Population aged 75 and over — 2025 (projected)5,212 people5,281 people
Total population — 2030 (projected)23,576 people22,598 people
Population aged 65 and over — 2030 (projected)8,004 people9,130 people
Population aged 75 and over — 2030 (projected)5,111 people5,808 people
Total population — 2035 (projected)21,945 people21,005 people
Population aged 65 and over — 2035 (projected)7,562 people8,798 people
Population aged 75 and over — 2035 (projected)4,740 people5,913 people
Total population — 2040 (projected)20,372 people19,404 people
Population aged 65 and over — 2040 (projected)7,286 people8,416 people
Population aged 75 and over — 2040 (projected)4,398 people5,716 people
Total population — 2045 (projected)18,785 people17,759 people
Population aged 65 and over — 2045 (projected)6,956 people7,953 people
Population aged 75 and over — 2045 (projected)4,131 people5,308 people
Total population — 2050 (projected)17,272 people16,149 people
Population aged 65 and over — 2050 (projected)6,593 people7,470 people
Population aged 75 and over — 2050 (projected)4,062 people4,915 people

Children, families and related measures

This group brings together measures with different definitions and source periods. A listed specialty or facility record is not evidence of service quality, capacity, availability or access.

This measure reports the source-published capacity as of 1 April 2025. It does not show vacancies or places currently available. Figures published only for a designated city are not allocated to its wards. Where no ward-level figure is verified, no figure is shown; this does not mean zero.

Measure名寄市嬉野市
Population aged 0–145,733 people3,225 people
Share of population aged 0–1411.17902%12.51067%
Facilities with a listed pediatrics entry1 facilities2 facilities
Physicians whose principal specialty is pediatrics7 people8 people
Facilities with a listed obstetrics and gynecology entry1 facilities1 facilities
Published childcare enrollment capacity429 capacity slots753 capacity slots
Households with members under 182,088 households2,018 households
Measure名寄市嬉野市
Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 20203,025 people3,229 people
Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 20252,518 people2,850 people
Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 20302,193 people2,448 people
Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 20351,986 people2,134 people
Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 20401,895 people1,944 people
Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 20451,770 people1,793 people
Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 20501,604 people1,633 people

Browse another municipality. Each municipality profile provides its own source details; comparison does not create a combined score or rank.

  • Values are descriptive statistics based on the same published facility snapshot.
  • Facilities with unknown bed counts are excluded from bed mean, median and distribution summaries; missing bed counts are not treated as zero.
  • Numeric differences describe facility composition. They do not indicate healthcare quality, capacity, access, need, adequacy, superiority or rank.
  • Population-denominated measures use the Basic Resident Register reference date as descriptive context; they do not measure need, access, quality, adequacy or superiority.
  • When a municipality has a zero population denominator, rates per 100,000 residents are not displayed, to avoid division by zero.

Sources and reference periods

Source titles and official records may be in Japanese. Dates and geographic units are shown separately for each source.

A missing numeric value is not converted to zero. Open a municipality profile to see its source details and geographic context.