MedOpenMedical open data for Japan
Explore

Side-by-side comparison

Compare municipality data

Select up to three municipalities and review published measures side by side. Values retain their source periods and geographic basis; the comparison does not rank places or rate healthcare.

Japanese place names are retained when no verified English name is available.

Comparison order

Selected municipalities

3 / 3 selected

The list and columns use a stable municipality-code order. Add or replace a place, remove one or clear the selection; the selected codes stay in this page URL.

  1. 1
    名古屋市 / 昭和区Aichi Prefecture · 23107
  2. 2
    名古屋市 / 瑞穂区Aichi Prefecture · 23108
  3. 3
    刈谷市Aichi Prefecture · 23210
Clear all selected places

Published measures

Descriptive values from their stated sources; periods may differ between measures.
Measure名古屋市 / 昭和区
Aichi Prefecture · 23107
Listed facilities		名古屋市 / 瑞穂区
Aichi Prefecture · 23108
Listed facilities		刈谷市
Aichi Prefecture · 23210
Listed facilities
Listed hospitals (facilities at provider locations)667
Reported beds (beds reported by hospitals)2,2961,1041,484
Resident population (people)106,491107,751152,984
Listed hospitals per 100,000 residents5.635.574.58
Reported beds per 100,000 residents2,156.051,024.58970.04

“Reported beds” are not licensed, staffed, available or occupied beds. Per-population rates combine provider-location counts with resident-population denominators; they do not measure access or capacity.

Facility profile and published bed measures

Measure名古屋市 / 昭和区名古屋市 / 瑞穂区刈谷市
Listed hospitals (provider-location count)667
Facilities with a reported bed count667
Reported beds (hospital survey field)2,296 beds1,104 beds1,484 beds
Mean reported beds per reporting facility382.67 beds184 beds212 beds
Median reported beds per reporting facility182.5 beds69.5 beds155 beds
First quartile (Q1) of reported beds82.5 beds40.25 beds100 beds
Third quartile (Q3) of reported beds621.5 beds94.25 beds202.5 beds

Bed summaries exclude records with unknown bed counts. A missing bed count is not treated as zero. These figures describe the listed facility records and do not measure capacity or access.

Distribution of listed hospitals by reported-bed band

Bands are descriptive groups of reported bed counts. They are not quality ratings or rankings.

Measure名古屋市 / 昭和区名古屋市 / 瑞穂区刈谷市
0–99 beds252
100–199 beds203
200–399 beds001
400+ beds211

名古屋市 / 昭和区

Hospitals with 400 or more reported beds
33.33%
Share of reported beds at the three largest facilities
88.59%

Shares use facilities and bed counts reported in this snapshot; they do not rate places.

名古屋市 / 瑞穂区

Hospitals with 400 or more reported beds
16.67%
Share of reported beds at the three largest facilities
88.68%

Shares use facilities and bed counts reported in this snapshot; they do not rate places.

刈谷市

Hospitals with 400 or more reported beds
14.29%
Share of reported beds at the three largest facilities
74.73%

Shares use facilities and bed counts reported in this snapshot; they do not rate places.

Housing measures

Housing statistics describe the survey's municipal geography and reference period. They are not healthcare measures.

Measure名古屋市 / 昭和区名古屋市 / 瑞穂区刈谷市
Housing units63,430 housing units58,450 housing units73,500 housing units
Vacant housing rate13.905092%11.360137%10.598639%
Owner-occupied housing rate47.965006%53.630952%59.652174%
Rented housing rate52.034994%46.369048%40.347826%
Floor area per dwelling75.21 m²80.02 m²93.48 m²
Monthly rent (includes zero-yen responses)64,621 JPY per month59,716 JPY per month54,730 JPY per month

Road traffic safety records

These events are grouped by occurrence-location municipality, not by residents' place of residence or provider location. Counts do not measure individual risk or predict future events.

Measure名古屋市 / 昭和区名古屋市 / 瑞穂区刈谷市
Road traffic accidents335 cases313 cases534 cases
Road traffic deaths1 people1 people2 people
Road traffic injuries374 people373 people654 people

Older population, households and care providers

Resident population

Resident-population geography.

Measure名古屋市 / 昭和区名古屋市 / 瑞穂区刈谷市
Population aged 65 and over25,086 people26,996 people31,028 people
Population aged 75 and over13,258 people14,204 people15,141 people
Share of population aged 65 and over23.96057%28.03469%20.91738%

Resident household measures

Household geography, based on residents' place of residence.

Measure名古屋市 / 昭和区名古屋市 / 瑞穂区刈谷市
Single-person households with a householder aged 65 and over6,274 households6,431 households5,279 households

Care providers by provider location

Provider-location geography. Provider counts do not show where residents receive services or whether services are available.

Measure名古屋市 / 昭和区名古屋市 / 瑞穂区刈谷市
Home-visit care providers50 service providers40 service providers33 service providers
Visiting nursing providers32 service providers30 service providers22 service providers
Day-care providers13 service providers13 service providers26 service providers
Care-management providers28 service providers30 service providers30 service providers
Welfare-facility providers3 service providers5 service providers5 service providers

Projected population

Future values are source-produced projections, not observed future outcomes. Each row retains its stated reference year and observation status.

Measure名古屋市 / 昭和区名古屋市 / 瑞穂区刈谷市
Total population — 2020 (baseline)107,599 people108,332 people153,834 people
Population aged 65 and over — 2020 (baseline)25,424 people29,453 people31,748 people
Population aged 75 and over — 2020 (baseline)13,470 people15,397 people15,479 people
Total population — 2025 (projected)107,820 people108,257 people155,197 people
Population aged 65 and over — 2025 (projected)25,708 people29,953 people33,261 people
Population aged 75 and over — 2025 (projected)14,987 people17,740 people19,236 people
Total population — 2030 (projected)107,118 people107,268 people154,984 people
Population aged 65 and over — 2030 (projected)26,456 people30,738 people35,688 people
Population aged 75 and over — 2030 (projected)15,260 people18,252 people20,733 people
Total population — 2035 (projected)106,011 people105,945 people153,925 people
Population aged 65 and over — 2035 (projected)27,454 people31,501 people38,755 people
Population aged 75 and over — 2035 (projected)15,241 people18,118 people21,005 people
Total population — 2040 (projected)104,182 people104,157 people151,845 people
Population aged 65 and over — 2040 (projected)28,911 people33,095 people42,532 people
Population aged 75 and over — 2040 (projected)15,751 people18,496 people22,210 people
Total population — 2045 (projected)101,800 people101,970 people148,880 people
Population aged 65 and over — 2045 (projected)29,518 people33,629 people44,422 people
Population aged 75 and over — 2045 (projected)16,642 people19,159 people24,359 people
Total population — 2050 (projected)99,364 people99,531 people145,393 people
Population aged 65 and over — 2050 (projected)29,843 people33,767 people45,485 people
Population aged 75 and over — 2050 (projected)18,034 people20,751 people27,561 people

Children, families and related measures

This group brings together measures with different definitions and source periods. A listed specialty or facility record is not evidence of service quality, capacity, availability or access.

This measure reports the source-published capacity as of 1 April 2025. It does not show vacancies or places currently available. Figures published only for a designated city are not allocated to its wards. Where no ward-level figure is verified, no figure is shown; this does not mean zero.

Measure名古屋市 / 昭和区名古屋市 / 瑞穂区刈谷市
Population aged 0–1413,014 people12,066 people20,887 people
Share of population aged 0–1412.43016%12.53025%14.08087%
Facilities with a listed pediatrics entry3 facilities2 facilities1 facilities
Physicians whose principal specialty is pediatrics100 people41 people17 people
Facilities with a listed obstetrics and gynecology entry3 facilities1 facilities1 facilities
Published childcare enrollment capacityNot observedNot observed3,656 capacity slots
Households with members under 189,305 households8,735 households14,714 households
Measure名古屋市 / 昭和区名古屋市 / 瑞穂区刈谷市
Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 202013,015 people13,212 people21,307 people
Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 202512,822 people13,009 people19,960 people
Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 203012,314 people12,435 people18,405 people
Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 203511,998 people12,026 people17,915 people
Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 204011,920 people11,932 people17,696 people
Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 204511,646 people11,683 people17,229 people
Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 205011,114 people11,175 people16,330 people

Diagnosis Procedure Combination (DPC) records

DPC is the Diagnosis Procedure Combination diagnosis-group classification used in these records. DPC/PDPS refers to the separate Diagnosis Procedure Combination / Per-Diem Payment System. The categories and patient counts here describe source records and reporting coverage; they are not a quality rating, hospital recommendation or complete measure of care provided.

Measure名古屋市 / 昭和区名古屋市 / 瑞穂区刈谷市
DPC records545
Reported DPC patient count43,406 people17,987 people16,192 people
Reported emergency admissions9,355 admissions2,212 admissions4,336 admissions
Reported ambulance transports45,690 transports19,080 transports16,521 transports
Measure名古屋市 / 昭和区名古屋市 / 瑞穂区刈谷市
DPC major diagnosis category 069,832 reported cases (22.65%)4,862 reported cases (27.03%)3,648 reported cases (22.53%)
DPC major diagnosis category 044,704 reported cases (10.84%)1,729 reported cases (9.61%)2,588 reported cases (15.98%)
DPC major diagnosis category 054,439 reported cases (10.23%)1,227 reported cases (6.82%)1,523 reported cases (9.41%)
DPC major diagnosis category 113,761 reported cases (8.66%)1,720 reported cases (9.56%)1,684 reported cases (10.4%)
DPC major diagnosis category 123,013 reported cases (6.94%)782 reported cases (4.35%)638 reported cases (3.94%)
DPC major diagnosis category 012,726 reported cases (6.28%)1,242 reported cases (6.9%)1,157 reported cases (7.15%)
DPC major diagnosis category 022,518 reported cases (5.8%)854 reported cases (4.75%)509 reported cases (3.14%)
DPC major diagnosis category 072,306 reported cases (5.31%)1,099 reported cases (6.11%)1,031 reported cases (6.37%)
DPC major diagnosis category 162,156 reported cases (4.97%)669 reported cases (3.72%)1,154 reported cases (7.13%)
DPC major diagnosis category 101,730 reported cases (3.99%)460 reported cases (2.56%)454 reported cases (2.8%)
DPC major diagnosis category 031,634 reported cases (3.76%)1,055 reported cases (5.87%)715 reported cases (4.42%)
DPC major diagnosis category 141,222 reported cases (2.82%)431 reported cases (2.4%)163 reported cases (1.01%)
DPC major diagnosis category 131,142 reported cases (2.63%)597 reported cases (3.32%)158 reported cases (0.98%)
DPC major diagnosis category 09802 reported cases (1.85%)369 reported cases (2.05%)154 reported cases (0.95%)
DPC major diagnosis category 08639 reported cases (1.47%)607 reported cases (3.37%)283 reported cases (1.75%)
DPC major diagnosis category 18590 reported cases (1.36%)252 reported cases (1.4%)245 reported cases (1.51%)
DPC major diagnosis category 15158 reported cases (0.36%)32 reported cases (0.18%)88 reported cases (0.54%)
DPC major diagnosis category 1734 reported cases (0.08%)Not reportedNot reported

Browse another municipality. Each municipality profile provides its own source details; comparison does not create a combined score or rank.

  • Values are descriptive statistics based on the same published facility snapshot.
  • Facilities with unknown bed counts are excluded from bed mean, median and distribution summaries; missing bed counts are not treated as zero.
  • Numeric differences describe facility composition. They do not indicate healthcare quality, capacity, access, need, adequacy, superiority or rank.
  • Population-denominated measures use the Basic Resident Register reference date as descriptive context; they do not measure need, access, quality, adequacy or superiority.
  • When a municipality has a zero population denominator, rates per 100,000 residents are not displayed, to avoid division by zero.

Sources and reference periods

Diagnosis Procedure Combination (DPC) records

Source agency or portal
Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW)
Reference period
2024-06-01/2025-05-31
Retrieved
24 August 2026 at 18:37:32 UTC

Official source (Japanese)

Source titles and official records may be in Japanese. Dates and geographic units are shown separately for each source.

A missing numeric value is not converted to zero. Open a municipality profile to see its source details and geographic context.