MedOpenMedical open data for Japan
Explore

Side-by-side comparison

Compare municipality data

Select up to three municipalities and review published measures side by side. Values retain their source periods and geographic basis; the comparison does not rank places or rate healthcare.

Japanese place names are retained when no verified English name is available.

Comparison order

Selected municipalities

3 / 3 selected

The list and columns use a stable municipality-code order. Add or replace a place, remove one or clear the selection; the selected codes stay in this page URL.

  1. 1
    名古屋市 / 瑞穂区Aichi Prefecture · 23108
  2. 2
    名古屋市 / 天白区Aichi Prefecture · 23116
  3. 3
    東海市Aichi Prefecture · 23222
Clear all selected places

Published measures

Descriptive values from their stated sources; periods may differ between measures.
Measure名古屋市 / 瑞穂区
Aichi Prefecture · 23108
Listed facilities		名古屋市 / 天白区
Aichi Prefecture · 23116
Listed facilities		東海市
Aichi Prefecture · 23222
Listed facilities
Listed hospitals (facilities at provider locations)642
Reported beds (beds reported by hospitals)1,1041,257708
Resident population (people)107,751156,525113,352
Listed hospitals per 100,000 residents5.572.561.76
Reported beds per 100,000 residents1,024.58803.07624.6

“Reported beds” are not licensed, staffed, available or occupied beds. Per-population rates combine provider-location counts with resident-population denominators; they do not measure access or capacity.

Facility profile and published bed measures

Measure名古屋市 / 瑞穂区名古屋市 / 天白区東海市
Listed hospitals (provider-location count)642
Facilities with a reported bed count642
Reported beds (hospital survey field)1,104 beds1,257 beds708 beds
Mean reported beds per reporting facility184 beds314.25 beds354 beds
Median reported beds per reporting facility69.5 beds314 beds354 beds
First quartile (Q1) of reported beds40.25 beds195 beds297 beds
Third quartile (Q3) of reported beds94.25 beds433.25 beds411 beds

Bed summaries exclude records with unknown bed counts. A missing bed count is not treated as zero. These figures describe the listed facility records and do not measure capacity or access.

Distribution of listed hospitals by reported-bed band

Bands are descriptive groups of reported bed counts. They are not quality ratings or rankings.

Measure名古屋市 / 瑞穂区名古屋市 / 天白区東海市
0–99 beds500
100–199 beds010
200–399 beds011
400+ beds121

名古屋市 / 瑞穂区

Hospitals with 400 or more reported beds
16.67%
Share of reported beds at the three largest facilities
88.68%

Shares use facilities and bed counts reported in this snapshot; they do not rate places.

名古屋市 / 天白区

Hospitals with 400 or more reported beds
50%
Share of reported beds at the three largest facilities
88.54%

Shares use facilities and bed counts reported in this snapshot; they do not rate places.

東海市

Hospitals with 400 or more reported beds
50%
Share of reported beds at the three largest facilities
Value not returned

Shares use facilities and bed counts reported in this snapshot; they do not rate places.

Housing measures

Housing statistics describe the survey's municipal geography and reference period. They are not healthcare measures.

Measure名古屋市 / 瑞穂区名古屋市 / 天白区東海市
Housing units58,450 housing units90,410 housing units53,900 housing units
Vacant housing rate11.360137%11.934521%12.820037%
Owner-occupied housing rate53.630952%50.441059%61.983654%
Rented housing rate46.369048%49.558941%38.016346%
Floor area per dwelling80.02 m²75.6 m²90.52 m²
Monthly rent (includes zero-yen responses)59,716 JPY per month55,642 JPY per month53,206 JPY per month

Road traffic safety records

These events are grouped by occurrence-location municipality, not by residents' place of residence or provider location. Counts do not measure individual risk or predict future events.

Measure名古屋市 / 瑞穂区名古屋市 / 天白区東海市
Road traffic accidents313 cases508 cases302 cases
Road traffic deaths1 people1 people4 people
Road traffic injuries373 people574 people363 people

Older population, households and care providers

Resident population

Resident-population geography.

Measure名古屋市 / 瑞穂区名古屋市 / 天白区東海市
Population aged 65 and over26,996 people36,766 people25,005 people
Population aged 75 and over14,204 people19,501 people12,947 people
Share of population aged 65 and over28.03469%23.24461%22.47297%

Resident household measures

Household geography, based on residents' place of residence.

Measure名古屋市 / 瑞穂区名古屋市 / 天白区東海市
Single-person households with a householder aged 65 and over6,431 households7,874 households4,468 households

Care providers by provider location

Provider-location geography. Provider counts do not show where residents receive services or whether services are available.

Measure名古屋市 / 瑞穂区名古屋市 / 天白区東海市
Home-visit care providers40 service providers79 service providers18 service providers
Visiting nursing providers30 service providers50 service providers17 service providers
Day-care providers13 service providers24 service providers21 service providers
Care-management providers30 service providers48 service providers16 service providers
Welfare-facility providers5 service providers8 service providers5 service providers

Projected population

Future values are source-produced projections, not observed future outcomes. Each row retains its stated reference year and observation status.

Measure名古屋市 / 瑞穂区名古屋市 / 天白区東海市
Total population — 2020 (baseline)108,332 people164,817 people113,787 people
Population aged 65 and over — 2020 (baseline)29,453 people38,336 people25,693 people
Population aged 75 and over — 2020 (baseline)15,397 people20,381 people13,358 people
Total population — 2025 (projected)108,257 people159,714 people114,369 people
Population aged 65 and over — 2025 (projected)29,953 people40,379 people26,116 people
Population aged 75 and over — 2025 (projected)17,740 people23,747 people15,603 people
Total population — 2030 (projected)107,268 people158,783 people113,702 people
Population aged 65 and over — 2030 (projected)30,738 people43,576 people26,565 people
Population aged 75 and over — 2030 (projected)18,252 people25,053 people15,919 people
Total population — 2035 (projected)105,945 people157,352 people112,509 people
Population aged 65 and over — 2035 (projected)31,501 people47,316 people27,797 people
Population aged 75 and over — 2035 (projected)18,118 people26,055 people15,499 people
Total population — 2040 (projected)104,157 people155,377 people110,891 people
Population aged 65 and over — 2040 (projected)33,095 people51,207 people30,276 people
Population aged 75 and over — 2040 (projected)18,496 people28,034 people15,590 people
Total population — 2045 (projected)101,970 people152,705 people108,945 people
Population aged 65 and over — 2045 (projected)33,629 people52,309 people31,531 people
Population aged 75 and over — 2045 (projected)19,159 people30,816 people16,702 people
Total population — 2050 (projected)99,531 people149,490 people106,739 people
Population aged 65 and over — 2050 (projected)33,767 people52,563 people32,160 people
Population aged 75 and over — 2050 (projected)20,751 people34,038 people19,065 people

Children, families and related measures

This group brings together measures with different definitions and source periods. A listed specialty or facility record is not evidence of service quality, capacity, availability or access.

This measure reports the source-published capacity as of 1 April 2025. It does not show vacancies or places currently available. Figures published only for a designated city are not allocated to its wards. Where no ward-level figure is verified, no figure is shown; this does not mean zero.

Measure名古屋市 / 瑞穂区名古屋市 / 天白区東海市
Population aged 0–1412,066 people20,347 people16,453 people
Share of population aged 0–1412.53025%12.86401%14.78695%
Facilities with a listed pediatrics entry2 facilities1 facilities2 facilities
Physicians whose principal specialty is pediatrics41 people19 people11 people
Facilities with a listed obstetrics and gynecology entry1 facilities0 facilities — Confirmed zero1 facilities
Published childcare enrollment capacityNot observedNot observed3,583 capacity slots
Households with members under 188,735 households14,947 households11,427 households
Measure名古屋市 / 瑞穂区名古屋市 / 天白区東海市
Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 202013,212 people20,349 people16,558 people
Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 202513,009 people18,785 people15,252 people
Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 203012,435 people17,580 people14,223 people
Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 203512,026 people17,077 people13,901 people
Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 204011,932 people16,990 people13,856 people
Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 204511,683 people16,614 people13,560 people
Projected population aged 0–14 — 1 October 205011,175 people15,839 people12,932 people

Diagnosis Procedure Combination (DPC) records

DPC is the Diagnosis Procedure Combination diagnosis-group classification used in these records. DPC/PDPS refers to the separate Diagnosis Procedure Combination / Per-Diem Payment System. The categories and patient counts here describe source records and reporting coverage; they are not a quality rating, hospital recommendation or complete measure of care provided.

Measure名古屋市 / 瑞穂区名古屋市 / 天白区東海市
DPC records443
Reported DPC patient count17,987 people7,740 people8,762 people
Reported emergency admissions2,212 admissions3,399 admissions4,027 admissions
Reported ambulance transports19,080 transports8,142 transports9,178 transports
Measure名古屋市 / 瑞穂区名古屋市 / 天白区東海市
DPC major diagnosis category 064,862 reported cases (27.03%)1,533 reported cases (19.81%)1,958 reported cases (22.35%)
DPC major diagnosis category 041,729 reported cases (9.61%)1,376 reported cases (17.78%)1,305 reported cases (14.89%)
DPC major diagnosis category 111,720 reported cases (9.56%)830 reported cases (10.72%)818 reported cases (9.34%)
DPC major diagnosis category 011,242 reported cases (6.9%)157 reported cases (2.03%)628 reported cases (7.17%)
DPC major diagnosis category 051,227 reported cases (6.82%)667 reported cases (8.62%)748 reported cases (8.54%)
DPC major diagnosis category 071,099 reported cases (6.11%)224 reported cases (2.89%)291 reported cases (3.32%)
DPC major diagnosis category 031,055 reported cases (5.87%)227 reported cases (2.93%)392 reported cases (4.47%)
DPC major diagnosis category 02854 reported cases (4.75%)16 reported cases (0.21%)492 reported cases (5.62%)
DPC major diagnosis category 12782 reported cases (4.35%)271 reported cases (3.5%)214 reported cases (2.44%)
DPC major diagnosis category 16669 reported cases (3.72%)965 reported cases (12.47%)922 reported cases (10.52%)
DPC major diagnosis category 08607 reported cases (3.37%)77 reported cases (0.99%)230 reported cases (2.62%)
DPC major diagnosis category 13597 reported cases (3.32%)327 reported cases (4.22%)103 reported cases (1.18%)
DPC major diagnosis category 10460 reported cases (2.56%)635 reported cases (8.2%)327 reported cases (3.73%)
DPC major diagnosis category 14431 reported cases (2.4%)70 reported cases (0.9%)13 reported cases (0.15%)
DPC major diagnosis category 09369 reported cases (2.05%)20 reported cases (0.26%)134 reported cases (1.53%)
DPC major diagnosis category 18252 reported cases (1.4%)279 reported cases (3.6%)165 reported cases (1.88%)
DPC major diagnosis category 1532 reported cases (0.18%)56 reported cases (0.72%)22 reported cases (0.25%)
DPC major diagnosis category 17Not reported10 reported cases (0.13%)Not reported

Browse another municipality. Each municipality profile provides its own source details; comparison does not create a combined score or rank.

  • Values are descriptive statistics based on the same published facility snapshot.
  • Facilities with unknown bed counts are excluded from bed mean, median and distribution summaries; missing bed counts are not treated as zero.
  • Numeric differences describe facility composition. They do not indicate healthcare quality, capacity, access, need, adequacy, superiority or rank.
  • Population-denominated measures use the Basic Resident Register reference date as descriptive context; they do not measure need, access, quality, adequacy or superiority.
  • When a municipality has a zero population denominator, rates per 100,000 residents are not displayed, to avoid division by zero.

Sources and reference periods

Diagnosis Procedure Combination (DPC) records

Source agency or portal
Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW)
Reference period
2024-06-01/2025-05-31
Retrieved
24 August 2026 at 18:37:32 UTC

Official source (Japanese)

Source titles and official records may be in Japanese. Dates and geographic units are shown separately for each source.

A missing numeric value is not converted to zero. Open a municipality profile to see its source details and geographic context.